Model Nuclear Inventory 2007
Argentina
- Location and capability of nuclear facilities
- Fissile material holdings
- Nuclear activities
- International non-proliferation efforts
- Positions taken in international fora on
various issues of disarmament
1.
Location and Capability of Nuclear Facilities
Two nuclear reactors generate about 10% of Argentina’s
electricity. Since the 1950s, Argentina has pursued nuclear
energy and technological development programs. The country
was suspected of achieving a high capability of producing
material, in order to produce nuclear weapons. With the fall
of the military regime in the 1980s and implementation of
nuclear confidence-building agreements with the countries
long-time nuclear competitor Brazil, Argentina began the transition
into non-proliferation, bringing the nuclear program under
civilian support. The first commercial nuclear power reactor
has operated since 1974, and today Argentinean electricity
is largely privatized. http://www.uic.com.au/nip96.htm
In August 2006, the government announced a $3.5 billion US
strategic plan for the country's nuclear power sector. This
involves completing Atucha-2 (construction started in 1981
but was suspended in 1994 with only 80% of the work complete,
due to lack of funds) and extending the life of Atucha-1 and
Embalse. Extending the life of the Embalse CANDU-6 type plant
by 25 years in partnership with Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd
is expected to cost $400 million. Completing Atucha-2 by 2010
is expected to cost US$ 600 million, including 600 tonnes
of heavy water for $400 million.
http://www.uic.com.au/nip96.htm
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf96.html
http://www.ceip.org/programs/npp/nppargn.htm
http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Argentina/index.html
Power Reactors
Operational: 2 (Atucha-1; EMBALSE)
Under Construction: 1 (Atucha-2)
http://www.iaea.org/programmes/a2/index.html
Research Reactors
Operational: 5 (RA-0; -1; -3; -4; & -6)
Shut Down: 2 (RA-2; RA-8)
Decommissioned: 0
Under Construction: 0
Planned: 0
http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/rrdb/
Uranium Enrichment Plants
The construction of Pilcaniyeu was initiated in 1978 by the
military junta. In 2000 the enrichment plant was the first
plant in the world using gaseous diffusion technology to be
placed under IAEA safeguards. Enrichment services are currently
imported from the USA. In August 2006, Argentina’s Atomic
Energy Commission announced that it wanted to recommission
the enrichment plant, using its own Sigma advanced diffusion
enrichment technology, which is said to be competitive. It
proposed to restart enrichment on a pilot scale in 2007. The
main reason is to keep Argentina within the circle of countries
recognised as having the right to operate enrichment plants.
http://www.uic.com.au/nip96.htm
http://www.ceip.org/programs/npp/nppargn.htm
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/argentina/pilcaniyeu.htm
Uranium Mines
Active and Proposed
Sierra Pintada/San Rafael Mine (Mendoza)
San Rafael Mill (Mendoza)
Cerro Solo (Chubut)
Decommissioned
Don Otto (Salta)
Schlagintweit (Cordoba)
La Estela (San Luis)
Dr. Baulies (Mendoza)
Huemul (Mendoza)
Los Adobes (Chubut)
Los Colorados (La Rioja)
http://www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/uddsam.html#AR
Reprocessing Facilities
In the late 1960s the Ezeiza facility was built to extract
plutonium from spent reactor fuel. The facility was closed
in 1973, and in 1978, construction of a second reprocessing
facility at Ezeiza with a higher capacity began. Economic
constraints and political pressure from the US put an end
to the project in 1990. http://www.ceip.org/programs/npp/nppargn.htm
http://www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/efac.html
http://npc.sarov.ru/english/digest/22001/appendix8.html
2.
Fissile Material Holdings
Separated Civil Plutonium: 2.4 tons (end
2003)
http://www.isis-online.org/global_stocks/end2003/plutonium_watch2005.pdf
Highly Enriched Uranium: 0.012 tons (end
of 2003)
Supplier- US
http://www.isis-online.org/global_stocks/end2003/civil_heu_watch2005.pdf
Radioactive waste disposal
Low- and intermediate-level waste: Low- and intermediate-level
wastes, including spent fuel from the research reactors, are
handled at Ezeiza.
High-level waste: Spent fuel is stored at each power
plant. There is a dry storage at the Embalse plant. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf96.htm
3.
Nuclear Activities
Nuclear Research Centers
CAB - Centro Atómico Bariloche - Instituto Balseiro
CAC - Centro Atómico Constituyentes
CAE - Centro Atómico Ezeiza
Invap
Pierre Auger Project
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
http://www.radwaste.org/research.htm
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/cnpp2002/index.htm
Nuclear Cooperation
US: US designed a research reactor, RA-1, built in
1958 at Constituyentes. The construction of the reactor sparked
the Argentina-Brazil nuclear rivalry.
Germany: In 1968, Argentina purchased a 320 Mwe reactor
from a West German company, Siemens, for the Atucha I nuclear
power station. http://www.ceip.org/programs/npp/nppargn.htm
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/cnpp2002/index.htm
Australia: In 2001, negotiations of a Nuclear Cooperation
Agreement between Australia and Argentina began. This agreement
would enable the construction of a nuclear reactor in Australia
and allow Australia to store its radioactive waste in Argentina.
This proposal was met with strong opposition from international
and local NGOs; the agreement would be a violation of Argentina's
constitution, which forbids the import of nuclear waste. http://www.foe.org.au/mr/mr_21_12_01.htm
Egypt: In 1996, Argentina constructed a nuclear reactor
in Egypt with capabilities of producing sufficient fissile
material for nuclear weapons production. http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/egypt/nuke.html
Egypt, Algeria, Australia: Argentina has exported nuclear
reactors for research and radioisotope production to Egypt,
Algeria, and Australia. http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/cnpp2002/index.htm
Iran: In 1993, Argentina supplied Iran with 115.8
kg of 20% enriched uranium fuel. http://www.idds.org/acr2003/453e2MEN03.html
4.
International Nonproliferation Efforts
Treaties Signed and Ratified, Date of Deposit
Antarctic Treaty, 23 June 1961
APM Convention, 14 September 1999
Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, 27 November 1979
Certain Conventional Weapons Convention, 2 December 1981
Chemical Weapons Convention, 2 October 19953. Nuclear Activities
Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), 4 December 1998
Convention on Nuclear Safety, 16 July 1997
Convention on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, 6 May
1989
Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage,
14 November 2000
Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing
of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and
Other Related Materials, 13 August 2001
Inter-American Convention on Transparency in Conventional
Weapons Acquisitions, 2 March 2004
Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and
on the Safety of
Radioactive Waste Management, 18 June 2001
Mendoza Commitment, September 1991
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, 10 February 1995
Outer Space Treaty, 26 March 1969
Seabed Treaty, 21 March 1983
Treaty of Tlatelolco, 18 January 1994
Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, November
1977
Argentina has not yet signed the IAEA Additional Protocol.
Multilateral Groups
Australia Group
Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)
Nuclear Export Guidelines
Nuclear Suppliers Group
Wassenaar Agreement
Zangger Committee
http://www.nti.org/e_research/official_docs/inventory/pdfs/mendoza.pdf
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Conventions/liability_status.pdf
http://first.sipri.org/index.php
5.
Positions Taken in International Fora on Various Issues of
Nuclear Disarmament
WMD: “In the field of Weapons of Mass Destruction,
we continue actively promoting universality and strengthening
of existing disarmament and nonproliferation legally binding
instruments, with a view to strengthen the basis of shared
security.” - Statement by Ambassador Cesar Mayoral
to the 61st session of the General Assembly First Committee
on Disarmament and International Security, New York, 2 October
2006. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/political/1com/1com06/statements/Argentinaoct2.pdf
Security Assurances: “As far as Argentina is
concerned, the use of nuclear weapons in self-defense in response
to an attack using conventional weapons cannot be justified
under international law, because it is not proportionate to
the objective of the defensive action as acknowledged by the
United Nations Charter in Article 51, as has repeatedly been
stated by the International Court of Justice, which has emphasized
the requirement of proportionality as an essential element
of self-defence. We urge the nuclear-weapon States to review
the interpretative declarations they made on signing the additional
protocols to the Treaty of Tlatelolco with a view to their
complete withdrawal.” - Statement by Ambassador
Minister Marcelo Valle Fonrouge to the Conference on Disarmament,
Geneva, 28 February 2006.
http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/political/cd/speeches06/28february.htm#Argentina
777 UN Plaza - 6th Floor - New York, NY - 10017 - Ph: 212.682.1265 - Fax: 212.286.8211 - info@reachingcriticalwill.org
This site was created by Kache Productions ©2008
|