Home About News Action Donate Contact
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
Conference on Disarmament
General Assembly First Committee
UN Disarmament Commission
Special Session on Disarmament
Other...
Critical Issues
Publications
Treaties
NGO Contacts
Government Contacts
Calendar
Other...
Join

News in Brief
Michael Spies | Reaching Critical Will of WILPF

News in Brief section from the NPT News in Review, the daily NGO newsletter from the third session of the
Preparatory Committee for the 2010 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference
Tuesday, 5 May 2009

Complete PDF of this edition.

Preparation for 2010
The Chair of the PrepCom stated that he would like states to take decisions on several issues related to the 2010 RevCon on Wednesday, including the RevCon’s agenda, chair, and dates.

RevCon Agenda
• The Chair announced he is still awaiting feedback from delegations on the RevCon agenda, which he would like states to adopt on Wednesday.
• Canada said it would not object to using the agenda from the 2000 RevCon, with appropriate technical updates.
• The NAM reiterated its call for separate subsidiary bodies on disarmament, security assurances, and on the Middle East.

Chair’s working paper
• The Chair announced on Friday he would circulate draft elements on substantive recommendations, identifying steps ready for consensus, drawn from practical initiatives contained in statements and working papers.

RevCon Chair
• The chair announced the Non-Aligned Movement had nominated the Ambassador from the Philippines to chair the 2010 RevCon.

RevCon Dates
• The chair announced states would need to take a decision postponing the RevCon one week, to 3–28 May 2010, necessary to accommodate refurbishment of UN headquarters.

Highlights from General Debate, Day 1:

Secretary-General
• UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon personally addressed the opening of an NPT conference for the first time.1 He applauded recent high level statements, particularly by NWS Russia and the United States as part of a recent cascade of disarmament proposals intended to “slay the nuclear monster”. Toward achieving a positive outcome in 2010, he urged delegations to focus on elements where agreement was possible and to avoid absolutist positions that have no chance of gain consensus.

Balanced Implementation of the Treaty in 2010
• Toward achieving a progressive and consensual outcome in 2010, a number of delegations outlined elements of possible package approaches for the RevCon. Most delegations generally emphasized the importance of maintaining balance between the three pillars of the Treaty at the RevCon.
• The Arab Group outlined five areas where consensus should be sought, including: coherent and balanced progress in implementing the three pillars; legally binding negative security assurances; a comprehensive action plan to achieve universality through binding steps; reaffirming the right to peaceful uses of nuclear energy; and reinvigorating the Conference on Disarmament.
• Japan reiterated the 11 benchmarks for nuclear disarmament, proposed by Foreign Minister Hirofumi Nakasone on 27 April 2009. The benchmarks are organized into three substantive areas, including: disarmament steps by all weapons possessing states; multilateral measures; and measures to support and ensure the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Japan also announced it will hold a disarmament conference before the 2010 RevCon.
• The New Agenda Coalition said the 2010 should build on previous agreements.
• The Republic of Korea called for the following five steps to strengthen the NPT regime: universal adherence to IAEA comprehensive safeguards and the Additional Protocol;
• The UK announced that in June 2009 it would publish “The Road to 2010,” following from March 2009 remarks of Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
• The EU and France reiterated the validity of the 2007 EU plan of action for disarmament, presented to the UN General Assembly, based on concrete and balanced action on the three pillars.

Strengthening Safeguards and Non-Proliferation
• Several delegations expressed support for the IAEA Additional Protocol as the safeguard standard, including Russia, Canada, Australia, the EU, and New Zealand.
• Egypt warned against subjecting states to higher safeguards standards than those contained in the Treaty.
Signifying growing concern over the vitality of the NPT bargain, the NAM said that nuclear cooperation with non-NPT parties is a matter of concern. The NAM also said that the NWS must not share nuclear weapons-related technology or knowledge under any circumstances.
• The EU and Canada continued to cite Iran as a matter of concern. While Canada urged Iran to implement relevant UN Security Council resolutions and restore international confidence in its nuclear programmes, the EU and China stressed the need for diplomacy and the early resumption of negotiations. Japan urged Iran to respond positively to efforts to achieve a diplomatic solution.
• Participants in the Six Party Talks expressed divergent views on the DPRK. China appealed for calm. Japan called on the DPRK to implement UN Security Council resolution 1718 and the 2005 Joint Statement. The ROK noted the issue was vital for the integrity of the Treaty.

Nuclear Energy and the Fuel Cycle
• The NAM called on the RevCon to reiterate language agreed to in 2000, respecting every state’s choices in pursuing nuclear energy.
• The IAEA announced it had reached its funding target for establishment of a low enriched uranium fuel bank and that the Director would be submitted a proposal to the IAEA Board in June 2009.

Disarmament
• Several delegations called for implementation of the 13 steps, including the Arab Group, the NAM, Ireland, and Mexico.
• The majority of delegations2 welcomed recent top level reaffirmations of achieving disarmament from Russia and the United States. These delegation in particular welcomed the renewed US commitment to the CTBT, a verifiable FMCT, and the US/Russia pledge to pursue a follow on to START.
• The NAM said the RevCon should establish a timeframe for implementation of Article VI and adopt measures to verify this objective.
• The New Agenda Coalition said it will table a working paper on recommendations for moving disarmament forward.
• Russia suggested a number of measures to create an atmosphere conducive for moving forward nuclear disarmament, including: banning weapons from space; banning the creating of conventional strategic weapons; avoiding establishment of recoverable nuclear capabilities; and withdrawing nuclear weapons and missile defences to inside national territories.
• Malaysia suggested that taking nuclear weapons off alert as a complimentary qualitative step that could be taken a in conjunction with quantitative arms reductions.

Nuclear Weapon Free Zones
• Mexico called for second NWFZ conference ahead of RevCon.
• Mongolia reported on the first meeting of focal points between itself and the other NWFZs. It was not able to report any progress on a Treaty with China and Russia to consolidate its nuclear weapon free status.

Withdrawal from the Treaty
• Japan said states must adopt means to respond to treaty violators that withdraw from the NPT.
• The NAM remained steadfast in its position that current proposals go beyond the Treaty and that the right to withdraw should be governed by international treaty law.

Middle East
• Egypt and the Arab Group emphasized the connection between the decision to indefinitely extend the Treaty and the 1995 resolution on the Middle East. The Arab Group warned that all the outcomes from 1995, including the indefinite extension, would be compromise if the resolution remained unimplemented.
• The New Agenda Coalition called for concrete measures for the implementation of the 1995 resolution.
• The EU reiterated its call for states in the region to create zones free of nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
• Following from Egypt’s proposals to the 2008 PrepCom, Russia said it will provide proposals to current PrepCom.

Institutional Reform
• Canada continued to push for permanent institutional support for the NPT, announcing it would table another working paper on the subject.
• Ireland expressed support for Canada’s proposal of looking toward shorter annual meetings of states parties.

Notes
1. The Secretary-General sent an opening message to the 2007 PrepCom, delivered by an official from the Office of Disarmament Affairs.
2. Including: the NAM, the NAC, the EU, Canada, the Arab Group, Ireland, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Australia, Algeria, the Republic of Korea, Switzerland, Tunisia, and Nigeria.

777 UN Plaza - 6th Floor - New York, NY - 10017 - Ph: 212.682.1265 - Fax: 212.286.8211 - info@reachingcriticalwill.org
This site was created by Kache Productions ©2008