|
News in Brief
Ray Acheson and Beatrice Fihn | Reaching Critical Will
of WILPF
News in Brief section from the NPT News
in Review, the daily NGO newsletter from the
2010 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference
Tuesday, 4 May 2010
Complete
PDF of this edition
Disarmament
- The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), Austria, and Switzerland
expressed support for a nuclear weapons convention. That
is 62% of the states parties to the NPT (see NWC in Brief
for details).
- The UN Secretary-General emphasized the need for simultaneous
efforts on nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, arguing,
“Progress on disarmament cannot await a world free
of war, nuclear proliferation, or terrorism,” and
“progress on non-proliferation cannot await the elimination
of the last nuclear weapon.”
- The UN Secretary-General also announced he will visit
Hiroshima on 6 August where he will reiterate the UN's stand
for a world free of nuclear weapons.
- The NAM took note of the new START, saying that it remains
“below the international community's expectations
which anticipate more concrete uniform and systematic nuclear
disarmament efforts” involving all nuclear weapon
states.
- The NAM noted that the implementation of the 13 practical
steps and the unequivocal undertaking of nuclear weapon
states to eliminate their arsenals is crucial to the credibility
of the NPT. It suggested the RevCon call for a timeframe
with a list of specific actions for the implementation of
Article VI and a mechanism to verify compliance of NWS.
- Iran called for the establishment of “an independent
international group,” authorized by the NPT, to “prepare
a set of guidelines to operationalize” article VI
of the NPT, and should set a deadline for complete elimination
of all nuclear weapons within a specified timeframe.
- Iran also called for the immediate cessation of research,
development, or improvements of nuclear weapons and related
facilities and the introduction of a verification mechanism.
- Iran suggested the suspension of membership in the IAEA
Board of Governors for states that use or threaten to use
nuclear weapons.
- Ireland urged the NWS to work “speedily for further
substantial reductions and the eventual elimination of all
nuclear weapons, including non-deployed and non-strategic
nuclear weapons.”
- The EU likewise urged reductions and elimination of “sub-strategic”
nuclear weapons. It also called for an overall reduction
in the global stockpile of nuclear weapons
- The Philippines called on NWS to abandon their weapons
now.
- Indonesia called on NWS to “demonstrate, in deeds,
not mere words, their commitment to nuclear disarmament.”
- Australia urged NWS to “chart the course”
to the abolition of nuclear weapons and commit to action.
- Brazil described Article VI as “the seed”
of the NPT's “own self-correction” from being
an unfair Treaty that expresses the imbalances of the international
system.
- Brazil called on NWS to renounce the upgrading or development
of new nuclear weapons.
- Switzerland argued that nuclear weapons are useless, immoral,
and illegal. It called for a debate “concerning the
legitimacy of the use of nuclear weapons regardless of the
legitimacy of the motive of defence that can be invoked,”
noting that its aim “is to bring the humanitarian
aspect to the heart of the current debate on nuclear disarmament.”
- The Philippines said the UNSG's five-point proposal for
nuclear disarmament has offered a road map for accelerating
disarmament and liberating resources for climate change,
food insecurity, and the MDGs.
Non-proliferation
- Indonesia, an Annex 2 country of the Comprehensive Test
Ban Treaty (CTBT), declared that it is initiating the process
to ratify the Treaty.
- The UN Secretary-General suggested that states consider
“an alternative mechanism” for brining the CTBT
into effect.
- The UN Secretary-General also noted that he would convene
a ministerial meeting of the Conference on Disarmament on
the sidelines of the General Assembly in New York in autumn
2010 in regards to the fissile material (cut-off) treaty.
- The UN Secretary-General encouraged states to accept the
IAEA's additional protocol and improve its system of safeguards.
- The EU called for comprehensive safeguards agreement and
additional protocol to become the verification standard.
- Australia noted that it has made adherence to the additional
protocol a condition of supply of its uranium.
- Bulgaria called for full implementation of UNSC resolution
1540.
Nuclear energy and the fuel cycle
- Iranian President Ahmadeinejad declared that his government
has accepted the nuclear fuel supply proposal put forward
by the IAEA; though the UN Secretary-General called on Iran
to accept the deal.
- The US delegation announced that it would allocate $50
million to IAEA for new peaceful uses initiative to help
countries develop infrastructure for nuclear power.
- The NAM said there is no room for reinterpretation or
setting of conditions on Article IV.
- Morocco called for an international coalition to enhance
the contribution of nuclear energy to economic and social
development.
Universality
- Bulgaria noted that there are fundamental principles in
the NPT's preamble that are universal in scope and that
the RevCon should invite all non-parties to apply comprehensive
IAEA safeguards on their civilian nuclear activities and
cease manufacturing nuclear weapons and related materials.
Withdrawal
- The NAM reaffirmed its 2005 position that proposals put
forward on withdrawal then went beyond the provisions of
the NPT.
- The EU called for the RevCon to develop a “common
understanding” on how to “respond effectively”
to withdrawal.
- The US stated that while not proposing to amend the NPT
to limit the rights of states to withdraw, it would not
stand by when a treaty violator pulls out of the NPT in
an attempt to escape penalties and pursue nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapon free zones
- The US announced its intention to seek ratification of
the protocols to the treaties of Pelindaba and Raratonga.
- The NAM demanded the RevCon renew its unequivocal commitment
to the full implementation of the 1995 resolution on a NWFZ
in the Middle East.
- Morocco and the EU noted the necessity of implementing
the 1995 resolution.
- Canada noted that it supports efforts to bring peace to
the Middle East and to “make progress towards”
a NWFZ in the Middle East.
Nuclear sharing
- The NAM argued for a “firm and complete prohibition”
on the transfer of anything nuclear to non-states parties
and said the NWS should refrain from sharing nuclear knowledge
or equipment as part of security arrangements with any states.
- Iran called for the dismantling of nuclear weapons stationed
in US military bases.
Nuclear deterrence
- The NAM argued that the doctrine of nuclear deterrence
is an impediment to nuclear disarmament and does not bring
peace or international security.
- The Philippines urged for finding a way to “wean
nations away from their reliance on deterrence” and
“replace deterrence with diplomacy”.
- Ireland reminded delegates that the NPT provides “an
infinitely more effective shield against a nuclear holocaust
than the most costly armoury of offensive and defensive
equipment.”
- Switzerland noted there has not been a fundamental shift
in thinking in the role of nuclear weapons by NWS.
- The US argued that they would retain a nuclear deterrent
for as long as nuclear weapons exist in order to protect
their country and their allies.
Transparency
Institutional reform
- Austria announced that they would seek to financially
and politically support the establishment of a unit for
the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs in Vienna.
- Canada highlighted its working paper (WP.4) on institutional
reform, which calls for strengthening the review process
and related structures.
Civil society
- Austria said it would seek to establish a “hub of
expertise” in Vienna, consisting of experts on nuclear
disarmament.
777 UN Plaza - 6th Floor - New York, NY - 10017 - Ph: 212.682.1265 - Fax: 212.286.8211 - info@reachingcriticalwill.org
This site was created by Kache
Productions ©2008
|