|
Working paper submitted by
Belgium,
Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and
Norway,
complementary to the European Union Common Position, for
consideration in Main Committee I and Subsidiary Body 1
1. Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT)*
1. States parties will make every effort to ensure the earliest
possible entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban
Treaty (CTBT), but not later than the 2005 Review Conference, through
ratification without delay and without conditions, especially by
those 44 States whose ratification is required for its entry into
force.
2. Fissile material cut-off treaty (FMCT)*
2. States parties undertake, without any preconditions, to immediately
commence negotiations on a non-discriminatory, multilateral and
internationally and effectively verifiable treaty banning the production
of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive
devices, in accordance with the statement of the Special Coordinator
of the Conference on Disarmament of 1995 and the mandate contained
therein, and to achieve their successful conclusion at the earliest
possible date, but not later than the 2005 Review Conference. Pending
the entry into force, States parties will observe a moratorium on
the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons.
3. Further measures to be taken in the framework of para.
4 (C)*
(a) Non-strategic nuclear weapons
3. States parties underline the importance of the announcement
by the United States of America and the Russian Federation that
they would unilaterally implement reductions in the non-strategic
nuclear weapons. They encourage the United States and the Russian
Federation to proceed with the reductions of non-strategic nuclear
weapons in a transparent and irreversible manner and to include
the reduction and ultimate elimination of non-strategic nuclear
weapons in the overall nuclear arms reduction negotiations.
(b) Transparency and accountability
4. States parties confirm the importance of measures aimed at increasing
transparency with regard to nuclear arsenals. In particular, such
measures could include a commitment by the nuclear-weapon States
to provide periodically the aggregated numbers of warheads, delivery
systems and stocks of fissile materials for explosive purposes in
their possession. Nuclear-weapon States undertake to provide periodically
within the framework of the strengthened review process a written
account of the progress achieved towards the implementation of article
VI of the Treaty and paragraph 4 (c) of the 1995 Principles and
Objectives.
(c) Conference on Disarmament
5. States parties agree to pursue as a matter of priority intensive
consultations on appropriate ways and means to establish without
delay in the Conference on Disarmament an ad hoc working group for
the exchange of information and views on endeavours towards nuclear
disarmament.
(d) Fissile materials
6. States parties agree to consider options for dealing with fissile
material, which could include arrangements regarding weapons-usable
fissile material that is designated as excess or that is designated
for non-explosive purposes. These options could further include
voluntary measures regarding weapons-usable fissile material related
to military inventories with a view to achieving increased transparency,
which could prepare the ground for ultimately agreed irreversible
net reductions.
4. Negative security assurances
7. States parties agree that legally binding security assurances
by the five nuclear-weapon States to the non-nuclear-weapon States
parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
(NPT) would strengthen the nuclear non-proliferation regime.
* Item already tabled in Subsidiary Body 1 as NPT/CONF.2000/MC.I/SB.1/CRP.1.
777 UN Plaza - 6th Floor - New York, NY - 10017 - Ph: 212.682.1265 - Fax: 212.286.8211 - info@reachingcriticalwill.org
This site was created by Kache Productions ©2008
|