|
Difficulties in Eliminating C3I Facilities:
The Emergence of Dual-Use Systems in US Military Missions
and Operations
In Section XI of the Model Nuclear Weapons Convention, there
is a subsection on "Command, Control, and Communications
Facilities and Deployment Sites" that stipulates "Each
State Party shall . . . destroy any facility, system or sub-system
designed or used solely for the purpose of launching, targeting,
directing, or detonating a nuclear weapon or its delivery
vehicle, or for aiding or assisting in any of these purposes"
[emphasis added]. To summarize this point, those systems with
both direct and indirect functions in nuclear operations are
to be eliminated or converted under the NWC.
The greatest conundrum concerns the indirect facets of the
nuclear complex: the supply of early warning data; and the
operation of communications systems. The US Department of
Defense (DOD) is now spending billions of dollars to enhance
and integrate these capabilities for both conventional and
nuclear missions. The recent high-level strategy document
Joint Vision 2010 has called for improved "dominant maneuver"
and "precision engagement" of forces based on improved
C3I systems. The US Navy has argued that:
To achieve information superiority over an adversary, the
Warfighter must be able to collect, process, and disseminate
an uninterrupted flow of information. DOD and the Navy are
deploying a global infosphere to achieve that superiority
anywhere, anytime, and in the performance of any mission.
. .The Defense Information Infrastructure (DII) delivers
the infosphere’s communications networks, computers,
software, databases, applications, and other capabilities
[emphasis added].
To the extent that this doctrine is implemented, the goals
of the above section of the NWC might be impossible to realize.
For instance, as part of the overall "Defense Information
Infrastructure," all strategic and attack submarines
are now being equipped with faster and more flexible communications
systems. Attack submarines (SSNs) in particular have both
conventional and nuclear roles. Even if Tridents (SSBNs) are
destroyed and SSNs are given purely conventional missions,
these fleets will continue to require the communications systems
now associated with nuclear operations.
Moreover, part of current and ongoing NORAD computer upgrades
is the transition of nuclear-specific communications lines
to this global, integrated network. Similarly, the early warning
sensors that supply data to NORAD, and the computer programs
that correlate and filter that same data for human consumption,
are now utilized to warn of "theater missile events"
such as SCUD missile attacks in the Middle East.
Perhaps most alarming, there is now concrete bureaucratic
planning for converting the delivery systems and launch platforms
themselves into conventional vehicles, which would also undermine
the NWC’s attempt to eliminate those command systems
with direct nuclear functions. Congress has funded plans for
converting some Trident SSBNs for cruise missile launching
in engagements with rogue states, while Minuteman ICBMs might
soon carry conventional payloads for "precision strikes"
against rogue-state WMD targets. These developments would
jeopardize the elimination of navigational information (for
ICBMs); delivery vehicles (for ICBMs); launch platforms (for
ICBMs and Tridents); and command and control systems associated
with these vehicles and platforms. Certainly, Strategic Command
would itself have to retain all computer systems and databanks
that allow target identification, battle management, targeting
of weapons, tracking of delivery vehicles, and communications
with these vehicles and platforms. The NWC would be reduced
to the elimination of warheads and nuclear production facilities
alone, with all other infrastructure essentially intact.
To guard against these developments, all dual-use strategies,
doctrines, missions, and planning must be thoroughly investigated
with the goals of the NWC in mind. Policymakers should be
made aware of the consequences of systems integration now
being undertaken by the military, lest it become a tangled
web that can never be unwoven.
Michael Kraig
Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies
www.idds.org
777 UN Plaza - 6th Floor - New York, NY - 10017 - Ph: 212.682.1265 - Fax: 212.286.8211 - info@reachingcriticalwill.org
This site was created by Kache Productions ©2008
|