| Explanation of vote
Draft resolution L20
Canadian delegation
Over the course of the First Committee, Canada has consistently
reiterated its expectation that the international instruments available
to us for consideration of disarmament issues are used to better
effect. In this context, others too, including the NAM for example,
have called for the revitalization of the UNDC. Properly utilized,
the UNDC has proven itself capable of producing substantive and
valuable contributions to the disarmament discourse, including for
example the 16 Verification Principles. There is no real reason
why the UNDC cannot make similar such contributions in future.
Canada is deeply disappointed with the performance of the Commission
during the last three years; in particular its failure to agree
on a substantive report that could be endorsed by this Committee.
We are also concerned that the First Committee has adopted a resolution
that recommends consideration by the UNDC of substantive disarmament
items, but that no items were discussed or included in the resolution.
Additionally, this Committee has adopted a resolution that requests
the UNDC to meet in 2004, wit the concomitant financial costs that
must be assumed for UN services, although we have not agreed on
whether or not the Commission will have work to do at that time.
Canada remains hopeful that we can capitalize on the opportunities
afforded by the UNDC to further the discussion on key disarmament
issues. To do so, we must first collectively identify issues for
constructive exchange during the coming session of the UNDC. WE
encourage all delegations to reflect in the weeks ahead on how to
ensure that this new session of the UNDC is effective and to convey
their ideas to the UNDC bureau.
777 UN Plaza - 6th Floor - New York, NY - 10017 - Ph: 212.682.1265 - Fax: 212.286.8211 - info@reachingcriticalwill.org
This site was created by Kache Productions ©2008
|