Home About News Action Donate Contact
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
Conference on Disarmament
General Assembly First Committee
UN Disarmament Commission
Special Session on Disarmament
Other...
Critical Issues
Publications
Treaties
NGO Contacts
Government Contacts
Calendar
Other...
Join

Japan

Explanation of vote
L.39 (Follow up to ICJ Advisory Opinion)

Thank you Mr. Chairman,

I would like to explain Japan's position on the vote on the draft resolution contained in document A/C.1/59/L.39, entitled, "Follow-up to the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of nuclear Weapons."

Mr. Chairman

First of all, we highly appreciate Malaysia's sincere attitude and firm commitment to the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament, which led to the proposing of draft resolution L.39.

Japan also believes that, because of their immense power to cause destruction and death and injury to human beings, the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to the fundamental humanitarianism which informs international law and provides its philosophical foundation. Therefore, we would like to stress that nuclear weapons should never be used again, and continuous efforts should be made towards achieving a world free of nuclear weapons.

However, the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, which this draft resolution addressed, clearly demonstrates the complexity of the subject.

Japan supports the unanimous opinion of the judges of the ICJ on the existing obligations under international law to pursue nuclear disarmament and to conclude negotiations on the matter in good faith. Japan firmly believes that we must take concrete measures to achieve steady, step-by-step progress in nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament.

In this context, we believe it is premature to 'call upon all the states immediately to fulfill that obligation by commencing multilateral negotiations leading to an early conclusion of a nuclear weapons convention prohibiting the development, production, testing, deployment, stockpiling, transfer, threat or use of nuclear weapons.'

We believe that such steady, incremental progress should be made prior to our embarking upon the negotiations which resolution L.19 calls upon all states to commence. This is the reason for Japan's abstention on this draft resolution.

Finally, Mr. Chairman, Japan continues to encourage all efforts to advance nuclear disarmament.

777 UN Plaza - 6th Floor - New York, NY - 10017 - Ph: 212.682.1265 - Fax: 212.286.8211 - info@reachingcriticalwill.org
This site was created by Kache Productions ©2008