|
Disarmament Index
of high-level statements
delivered in the General Debate of the 61st Session of the
General Assembly, September 19 - 29, 2006
This is an index of all references made to issues of disarmament,
peace and security, made in the General Debate of the General
Assembly. This index is a tool to gauge the issues which will
be detailed during the First Committee of the General Assembly,
starting October 2, 2006.
Included are all references made to arms control, disarmament,
multilateralism, nuclear energy, nuclear weapon free zones,
security, proliferation, terrorism and weapons.
(Note: some transcripts were not available in English.
Some excerpts are therefore unofficial translations by the
RCW staff.)
These statements are to be delivered September 19 - 29, 2006.
Speeches by:
Secretary-General Kofi Annan, and
General Assembly President (61st Session)
Ambassador Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa (Bahrain)
Click on a country below to see relevant excerpts from Conference
United
Nations Secretary General
H.E. Mr. Kofi A. Annan,
Secretary-General
September 19, 2006
Small arms: "In far too many parts of the world
– especially the developing world – people are
still exposed to brutal conflicts, fought with small but deadly
weapons."
Disarmament and Non-proliferation: "And people in
all parts of the world are threatened – though some
are more aware of it than others – by the spread of
weapons of mass destruction. It is shameful that last year’s
Summit Outcome does not contain even one word about non-proliferation
and disarmament – basically because states could not
agree which of the two should be given priority. It is high
time to end this dispute, and tackle both tasks with the urgency
they demand."
Terrrorism: "Moreover, just as some who benefit
from globalization may feel threatened by it,
so, many who are statistically safer from conflict do not
feel safe.
For that, we have terrorism to thank. It kills or maims relatively
few people, compared to other forms of violence. But it spreads
fear and insecurity among many. And that in turn drives people
to huddle together with those who share their beliefs or their
way of life, while shunning those who appear “alien”."
President
of the 61st General Assembly
H.E. Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa
September 19, 2006
Disarmament: "we need to address specific potential
causes of tension in our world notably in the field of disarmament
and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction."
Multilateralism: "There is no perfect world and
the United Nations is a reflection of our world. If we remain
committed to multilateralism, the values and principles enshrined
in the Charter will strengthen our resolve to overcome the
challenges and threats ahead of us and bring about a safer
and more prosperous world for all."
Terrorism/Proliferation: "We live in a world afflicted
by violent armed conflicts, hunger and disease; a world threatened
by international terrorism, organized crime and the proliferation
of all types of weapons; a world brought closer together by
the forces of globalization, yet divided by ethnic strife,
and a growing technological gap; a world where the enjoyment
of human rights is still an unrealized dream for millions
of people."
Security: "Making our world a more secure place
requires the United Nations to take a more proactive role
when addressing the many armed conflicts within and amongst
states. We need to make further progress in the area of conflict
prevention. It is imperative that we have a high level debate
that can deliver an actionable outcome on this issue."
Terrorism: "With the adoption of the United Nations
Comprehensive Global Counter-terrorism Strategy, we have made
a historic step forward. We now need to work towards its effective
implementation. Meanwhile, we should redouble our efforts
towards reaching consensus on the most needed and long-overdue
Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism."
Brazil
H.E. Mr. Luiz Inácio
Lula da Silva, President
September 19, 2006
Security: “War
will never bring security.
…
If we do not want war to go global, justice must go global.”
Terrorism: “But
the Doha Development Agenda, which will decide the future
of the world trade
system, is now in crisis.
…
If the Round fails, the fallout will go far beyond trade.
The credibility of the WTO system itself will be jeopardized,
with negative repercussions in both political and social fields.
Scourges such as organized crime, drug trafficking and terrorism
will find fertile ground to proliferate.”
The
United States of America
H.E. Mr. George W. Bush, President
September 19, 2006
Terrorism:
“Last week, America and the world marked the fifth anniversary
of the attacks that filled another September morning with
death and suffering. On that terrible day, extremists killed
nearly 3,000 innocent people, including citizens of dozens
of nations represented right here in this chamber. Since then,
the enemies of humanity have continued their campaign of murder.
Al Qaeda and those inspired by its extremist ideology have
attacked more than two dozen nations. And recently a different
group of extremists deliberately provoked a terrible conflict
in Lebanon. At the start of the 21st century, it is clear
that the world is engaged in a great ideological struggle,
between extremists who use terror as a weapon to create fear,
and moderate people who work for peace. Five years ago, I
stood at this podium and called on the community of nations
to defend civilization and build a more hopeful future. This
is still the great challenge of our time; it is the calling
of our generation. This morning, I want to speak about the
more hopeful world that is within our reach, a world beyond
terror, where ordinary men and women are free to determine
their own destiny, where the voices of moderation are empowered,
and where the extremists are marginalized by the peaceful
majority. This world can be ours if we seek it and if we work
together.”
Roots
of terrorism: “Some have argued that the democratic
changes we're seeing in the Middle East are destabilizing
the region. This argument rests on a false assumption, that
the Middle East was stable to begin with. The reality is that
the stability we thought we saw in the Middle East was a mirage.
For decades, millions of men and women in the region have
been trapped in oppression and hopelessness. And these conditions
left a generation disillusioned, and made this region a breeding
ground for extremism.
Imagine what it's like
to be a young person living in a country that is not moving
toward reform. You're 21 years old, and while your peers in
other parts of the world are casting their ballots for the
first time, you are powerless to change the course of your
government. While your peers in other parts of the world have
received educations that prepare them for the opportunities
of a global economy, you have been fed propaganda and conspiracy
theories that blame others for your country's shortcomings.
And everywhere you turn, you hear extremists who tell you
that you can escape your misery and regain your dignity through
violence and terror and martyrdom. For many across the broader
Middle East, this is the dismal choice presented every day.
Every civilized nation,
including those in the Muslim world, must support those in
the region who are offering a more hopeful alternative. We
know that when people have a voice in their future, they are
less likely to blow themselves up in suicide attacks. We know
that when leaders are accountable to their people, they are
more likely to seek national greatness in the achievements
of their citizens, rather than in terror and conquest. So
we must stand with democratic leaders and moderate reformers
across the broader Middle East. We must give them voice to
the hopes of decent men and women who want for their children
the same things we want for ours. We must seek stability through
a free and just Middle East where the extremists are marginalized
by millions of citizens in control of their own destinies.
Today, I'd like to speak
directly to the people across the broader Middle East: My
country desires peace. Extremists in your midst spread propaganda
claiming that the West is engaged in a war against Islam.
This propaganda is false, and its purpose is to confuse you
and justify acts of terror. We respect Islam, but we will
protect our people from those who pervert Islam to sow death
and destruction. Our goal is to help you build a more tolerant
and hopeful society that honors people of all faiths and promote
the peace.”
Terrorism
and Iraq: “To the people of Iraq: Nearly 12 million
of you braved the car bombers and assassins last December
to vote in free elections. The world saw you hold up purple
ink-stained fingers, and your courage filled us with admiration.
You've stood firm in the face of horrendous acts of terror
and sectarian violence -- and we will not abandon you in your
struggle to build a free nation. America and our coalition
partners will continue to stand with the democratic government
you elected. We will continue to help you secure the international
assistance and investment you need to create jobs and opportunity,
working with the United Nations and through the International
Compact with Iraq endorsed here in New York yesterday. We
will continue to train those of you who stepped forward to
fight the enemies of freedom. We will not yield the future
of your country to terrorists and extremists. In return, your
leaders must rise to the challenges your country is facing,
and make difficult choices to bring security and prosperity.
Working together, we will help your democracy succeed, so
it can become a beacon of hope for millions in the Muslim
world.”
Terrorism
and Afghanistan: “To the people of Afghanistan:
Together, we overthrew the Taliban regime that brought misery
into your lives and harbored terrorists who brought death
to the citizens of many nations. Since then, we have watched
you choose your leaders in free elections and build a democratic
government. You can be proud of these achievements. We respect
your courage, and your determination to live in peace and
freedom. We will continue to stand with you to defend your
democratic gains. Today forces from more than 40 countries,
including members of the NATO Alliance, are bravely serving
side-by-side with you against the extremists who want to bring
down the free government you've established. We'll help you
defeat these enemies and build a free Afghanistan that will
never again oppress you, or be a safe haven for terrorists.”
Iran
and nuclear weapons, terrorism: “To the people
of Iran: The United States respects you; we your country.
We admire your rich history, your vibrant culture, and your
many contributions to civilization. You deserve an opportunity
to determine your own future, an economy that rewards your
intelligence and your talents, and a society that allows you
to fulfill your tremendous potential. The greatest obstacle
to this future is that your rulers have chosen to deny you
liberty and to use your nation's resources to fund terrorism,
and fuel extremism, and pursue nuclear weapons. The United
Nations has passed a clear resolution requiring that the regime
in Tehran meet its international obligations. Iran must abandon
its nuclear weapons ambitions. Despite what the regime tells
you, we have no objection to Iran's pursuit of a truly peaceful
nuclear power program. We're working toward a diplomatic solution
to this crisis. And as we do, we look to the day when you
can live in freedom -- and America and Iran can be good friends
and close partners in the cause of peace.”
Terrorism
and Syria: “To the people of Syria: Your land
is home to a great people with a proud tradition of learning
and commerce. Today your rulers have allowed your country
to become a crossroad for terrorism. In your midst, Hamas
and Hezbollah are working to destabilize the region, and your
government is turning your country into a tool of Iran. This
is increasing your country's isolation from the world. Your
government must choose a better way forward by ending its
support for terror, and living in peace with your neighbors,
and opening the way to a better life for you and your families.”
Terrorism
in the Middle East: “The world must also stand
up for peace in the Holy Land. I'm committed to two democratic
states -- Israel and Palestine -- living side-by-side in peace
and security. I'm committed to a Palestinian state that has
territorial integrity and will live peacefully with the Jewish
state of Israel. This is the vision set forth in the road
map -- and helping the parties reach this goal is one of the
great objectives of my presidency. The Palestinian people
have suffered from decades of corruption and violence and
the daily humiliation of occupation. Israeli citizens have
endured brutal acts of terrorism and constant fear of attack
since the birth of their nation. Many brave men and women
have made the commitment to peace. Yet extremists in the region
are stirring up hatred and trying to prevent these moderate
voices from prevailing.
This struggle is unfolding
in the Palestinian territories. Earlier this year, the Palestinian
people voted in
a free election. The leaders of Hamas campaigned on a platform
of ending corruption
and improving the lives of the Palestinian people, and they
prevailed. The world is waiting to see whether the Hamas government
will follow through on its promises, or pursue an extremist
agenda. And the world has sent a clear message to the leaders
of Hamas: Serve the interests of the Palestinian people. Abandon
terror, recognize Israel's right to exist, honor agreements,
and work for peace.
…
Freedom, by its nature,
cannot be imposed -- it must be chosen. From Beirut to Baghdad,
people are making the choice for freedom. And the nations
gathered in this chamber must make a choice, as well: Will
we support the moderates and reformers who are working for
change across the Middle East -- or will we yield the future
to the terrorists and extremists? America has made its choice:
We will stand with the moderates and reformers.”
South
Africa
H.E. Mr. Thabo Mbeki, President
September 19, 2006
Terrorism/Unilateralism: “. . . six
years into the 21st century dispassionate observers would
dare us to achieve our noble and lofty objectives, pointing
to the terrorists' acts that welcomed us into the new century.
They would emphasise the unilateralism that threatens to negate
the democratic advances of the last decades of the 20th century,
and draw attention to renewed conflicts and wars that seem
to compete with the destructive fury of the conflicts of the
last century.”
Finland
(on on behalf of the European Union, The Acceding Countries
Bulgaria and Romania, the Candidate Countries Turkey, Croatia
and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Countries
of the Stabilisation and Association Process and potential
candidates Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia
as well as Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova align themselves
with this declaration)
H.E. Ms. Tarja Halonen, President
September 19, 2006
Disarmament, multilateralism, proliferation: “We
see it important that this session of the General Assembly
will mark progress in the areas of disarmament and non-proliferation.
Concrete action is needed on small arms and light weapons
at the national, regional and global levels. The European
Union will continue to push for a legally-binding treaty on
trade in all conventional weapons. Effective multilateralism
is crucial in facing the growing threat of the proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction. The Security Council has a
central role in addressing those threats. In this regard,
the EU welcomes the unanimous adoption of resolution 1695
on Democratic People's Republic of Korea. We look forward
to its effective implementation and we call strongly upon
DPRK to implement fully the requirements of this resolution.
The EU also welcomes the adoption of the Security Council
resolution 1696 and calls upon Iran to respond positively
and swiftly to the demands of the international community
in implementing this resolution, in particular by suspending
its enrichment activities in accordance with the resolution.
This would pave the way for negotiations on a comprehensive
agreement aimed at restoring confidence that Iranian nuclear
programme serves exclusively peaceful purposes. We welcome
the current exploratory talks aimed to facilitate the opening
of the negotiations.”
Security: "An increasingly
important element in the promotion of global peace and security
is the need to foster tolerance, mutual understanding and
respect. In this regard, the EU has already expressed its
strong support for the Alliance of Civilizations initiative.”
…
Peace building is an integral part of the wide security concept.
The newly established Peacebuilding Commission brings its
own and much-needed contribution to the UN work for peace
and security. The European Union will work actively to ensure
that this new body will have a strong and dynamic role in
the UN system. Gender aspect is important in this context.
We also welcome the establishment of the Central Emergency
Response Fund to enhance the capability of the international
community to respond to urgent humanitarian needs.”
Terrorism: “Contrary
to our shared ideals, the realities of war and violence have
not become history. Conflicts and terrorism continue to destroy
the social and economic progress that we are all striving
for."
...
"The events of the past year show that terrorism continues
to threaten international peace and security. This threat
can be effectively addressed through broadly-based cooperation
in the framework of the United Nations. The European Union
welcomes the agreement on a global counter terrorism strategy
as an important instrument and expression of international
solidarity in the fight against terrorism. The EU urges UN
Member States to build on this achievement and to intensify
their efforts to reach a speedy consensus on the UN Comprehensive
Anti-Terrorism Convention. We underline the importance of
prevention, and conducting the fight against terrorism in
accordance with human rights, refugee law and international
humanitarian law."
The
Islamic Republic of Pakistan
H.E. General Pervez Musharraf, President
September 19, 2006
Multilateralism/Terrorism/Proliferation: “Multilateral
cooperation is the key to addressing the existing and emerging
challenges of the 21 " Century — political disputes,
terrorism, proliferation, poverty, hunger, disease, economic
disparities, migration, unemployment, environmental degradation
and natural disasters. We appreciate the Secretary General's
initiatives to equip t he United Nations to respond to these
challenges. But we are vet a distance from the vision endorsed
at the 2005 UN Summit.”
Nuclear/Arms: “A stable security environment
is also important for peace in our region. Pakistan has proposed
the creation of a Strategic Restraint Regime in South Asia,
encompassing minimum nuclear deterrence and a balance of conventional
forces. We do not want to enter into an arms race. But we
will do whatever is necessary to preserve the credibility
of our minimum defensive deterrence level.”
Nuclear Energy: “Pakistan has a legitimate
requirement for nuclear power generation to meet the energy
needs of our expanding economy. As a responsible nuclear State,
we will continue to seek nuclear technology for power generation
under IAEA safeguards. We cannot accept discrimination in
the nuclear field.”
Security/Terrorism: “Afghanistan confronts
complex security, political and economic challenges including
a resurgent Taliban who also threaten Pakistan's efforts against
extremism and terrorism. The common challenge imposes a joint
responsibility on Pakistan, Afghanistan and the coalition
forces.”
Terrorism: “The unfortunate history of our
region has placed Pakistan in the frontline of the global
campaign against terrorism. We cooperate daily with many countries
including the United States and the United Kingdom. Our cooperation
has pre-empted several terrorist plots, such as the one uncovered
recently to blow up airliners flying London. Over the past
five years, Al-Qaeda has been significantly degraded as an
organization."
Terrorism: “While we confront terrorism, our
strategy must seek to eliminate this phenomenon comprehensively.
We cannot do so unless we understand and address the root
causes of terrorism today. How are terrorists able to find
willing recruits even among educated youth in advanced and
democratic societies? The reasons are clear."
Terrorism: “Across the Muslim world, old conflicts
and new campaigns of military intervention have spawned a
deep sense of desperation and injustice. Each new battleground
involving an Islamic state has served as a new breeding ground
for extremists and terrorists. Indiscriminate bombings, civilian
casualties, torture, human rights abuses, racial slurs and
discrimination only add to the challenge of defeating terrorism."
Terrorism: “In my view a two pronged strategy,
which I call "Enlightened Moderation", is required to address
the situation. This strategy envisages that, apart from combating
terrorism frontally, the international community must undertake
resolute efforts to resolve the conflicts afflicting the Islamic
world. Unless we end foreign occupation and suppression of
Muslim peoples, terrorism and extremism will continue to find
recruits among alienated Muslims in various parts of the world."
Security/Terrorism: “The greatest challenge
to global security; to the campaign against terrorism; to
the promotion of harmony among civilization; to the credibility
of the United Nations, is the cauldron of conflict that is
the Middle East. This was exemplified by the latest Israeli
aggression against Lebanon. We hope that the resolution painstakingly
brokered in the Security Council will lead to rapid and complete
Israeli withdrawal and restoration of Lebanon's sovereignty
over its entire territory.”
Terrorism: “It is time to end Israel's conflicts
with all its neighbours. It is time, first and foremost, to
en d the tragedy of Palestine. There is no doubt in our mind
that this is the core of the challenge, not only to overcome
the Iraq and Afghanistan problems, but also to deal with the
menace of terrorism and extremism.”
Nuclear: “The confrontation over Iran's nuclear
programme threatens further instability in this already inflamed
region. We are encouraged by the Iran and 5-1 negotiations
and believe that this issue can be resolved peacefully in
a manner that accommodates the legitimate rights and interests
of all parties. Resort to coercion Änd, worse, the use
of force, could lead to grave consequences, regional and global.”
France
Mr Jacques Chirac, President
September 19, 2006
Security: “Because the conflict in
the Middle East is a threat to global peace and security,
the world has no option but to be the guarantor of peace.
Let us tread off the beaten track of habit. Let us define
a global strategy the key to which is an Israeli-Palestinian
settlement.”
Security: “I also propose that the conference
pave the way for a new future in the Middle East, through
a regional framework for collective security, and economic
integration and dialogue among cultures.”
Terrorism/Proliferation: “To build peace means
fighting terrorism. Means preventing proliferation. Means
shouldering the ‘responsibility to protect’ that
we enshrined here last year.”
Proliferation: “International legality must
prevail aver the threats of proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction. In the crisis with Iran, confidence has been
impaired by the existence of illegal programmes. We have extended
to that major country ambitious offers of cooperation, provided
it restores confidence by suspending its contentious activities.
Dialogue must prevail.”
Security: “Given the seriousness of what is
at stake, the international community must stand firm and
united. We do not aim to call regimes into question. We aim
to ensure security in accordance with international law and
with due regard for the sovereignty of all countries.”
Poland
H.E. Mr. Lech Kaczyński,
President
September 19, 2006
Energy security:
“At this point I would like to draw your attention to
the question of energy security - increasingly important for
many regions of the world. This security should be based on
the diversification of supply sources and on building such
energy connections that could not be used as a means of political
pressure.”
Security: “Globalization
reveals the scale of problems that we previously did not fully
realize. I am speaking about ever deepening inequalities and
exclusion from civilisation progress, vast areas of poverty
and instability that, on the one hand, cause moral resistance,
and, on the other, increase the threat to peace and security.”
“Poland supports Israel's right to security. At the
same time Poland supports the aspirations of the Palesti nian
nation to build an independent state. We have been involved
in the stabilization of the region for many years. We actively
participate in the UNIFIL mission in Lebanon. A month ago,
at the request of the Secretary-General of the United Nations,
we declared that we would increase our military contingent.”
Terrorism: “I
believe that where tensions and social conflicts are resolved
through dialogue, where respect is promoted for different
cultures and religions, where economic inequalities between
societies and states are prevented - terrorism will not find
soil to grow. In the long run global solidarity is the most
effective weapon against those who would like to see the world
as a scene of unending fight.”
Congo
H.E. Mr. Denis Sassou Nguesso,
President
September 19, 2006
Available in French
only.
Mexico
H.E. Mr. Vicente Fox, President
September 19, 2006
Terrorism: " We recently
honored the fifth anniversary of terrorist acts that put a
lot of families of this country and others, into mourning
and grief. Those who have suffered the violence and cruelty
caused by terrorism, please accept our respect and expression
of solidarity. Mexico firmly condemns this most terrible threat
as well as any act of aggression or violence. We repudiate
any act against peace and any action that does not conform
with the principles and purposes of our Organization.
Throughout six decades, the peoples of the United Nations
have expressed their belief that the use of force is not a
solution; on the contrary, it usually aggravates conflicts.
Together, we have learned that peace and development arise
from mutual respect and from the cooperation that emerges
and grows from such respect.”
Disarmament: “The
peoples of the United Nations are well aware of the fact that
the breaches of peace and security and our setbacks in our
search for greater development are a consequence of an insufficient
international dialogue and cooperation. We are also aware
that the root-cause of much of the setbacks --such as those
record in the field of disarmament as well as those that take
the form of aggression against other people or against the
environment— is the lack of, or the lost of respect
among nations.
These are times of great challenges. Our peoples today face
challenges such as those posed by longstanding international
conflicts that persist in tandem with the emergence of new
threats to international peace and security.”
Liberia
H.E. Ms. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, President
September 19, 2006
Security: “In the new Millennium, the United
Nations should not operate on the structures designed sixty-one
years ago. We must therefore review the inequitable representation
of the world’s people as reflected by the present structure
of the Security Council. It is in this regard that a reform
of the United Nations in urgent, especially the decision making
process in the Security Council which appear to be undemocratic
and hegemonic.”
Security: “Throughout its history, and excluding
the period of our civil conflicts, Liberia has always been
in the vanguard of promoting good neighborliness, peace, security,
and stability in our sub-region, our continent and our one
world. We therefore actively support the founding of the Organization
of African Unity (now African Union), the Economic Community
of West African States (ECOWAS) and the Mano River Union,
among others, because without peace, security, and stability,
there is very little that humankind can achieve.”
Security: “We are particularly concerned about
conflicts in other parts of the world. Of notable concern
is the protracted crisis in the Middle East, which continues
to create a state of restlessness and threatens world peace
and security.”
Security: “The United Nations’ obligation
to protect the helpless and innocent must remain paramount
in this regard. My government therefore calls on this General
Assembly and the Security Council to exercise the Chapter
Seven Authority to restore peace, security, and stability
to Darfur.”
Terrorism: “We also resolve, as all civilized
nations have, to join the global effort to fight terrorism
anywhere in the world recognizing that it is today the most
single challenge in world peace and collective freedom.”
Arms: “The Government of Liberia welcomes
the partial lifting of the arms embargo and the ban on timber
as imposed by UN Security Council Resolution 1521 (2003).”
Multilateralism: “We have made important beginnings
and we remain committed and encouraged by the bilateral support
provided by our bilateral and multilateral international partners.”
Jordan
H.M. King Abdullah II Bin
Al Hussein
September 19, 2006
Multilateralism/security:
" In 2002, the 22 Arab states - agreeing unanimously led the
way with a break th rough peace proposal. Our vision and commitment
is a viable, independent Palestinian state, living side-by-side
with a pure Israel . Under the Arab Peace Initiative, Israel's
security would be guaranteed, and the occupation of Palestine
would end, in accord with U.N. resolutions. Events show clearly
that there can be no unilateral solution to the conflict.
There must be a genuine partnership among all parties, in
th e context of international legality and justice. Such a
global pa rt nership for peace is directly connected to the
global partnership for development. Across the world, nations
at peace are moving forward with economic growth and development:
investing in education, building communities, helping to shape
the future of the globe. But no nation succeeds in isolation.
All nations , all people- especially our youth-must be able
to share in a promising future.”
Ghana
H.E. Mr. John Agyekum Kufuor, President
September 19, 2006
Security: “A year ago, we met at this historic
venue to adopt the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document in which
we acknowledged that peace and security, and development and
human rights were the pillars of the United Nations system,
and the foundations for our collective well-being.”
Terrorism/Security: “But, Madam President,
our collective objective within this organization to alleviate
the economic plight of the majority of mankind may continue
to elude us unless the pursuit of international peace and
security is effectively and satisfactorily addressed. Ghana,
therefore, views with grave concern the continuing spread
and persistence of terrorist activities. The international
community must rally to contain and effectively eradicate
this menace to mankind. In this regard, the Secretary-General's
proposal for a global counter-terrorism strategy is welcome.
Indeed, it is the view of Ghana that there must be a quick
conclusion of the deliberations on the proposed Comprehensive
Convention on International Terrorism.”
Nuclear/Weapons/Energy/Security/Nonproliferation:
“Yet another scourge to the security of the world is
the snail-paced talks on the elimination of nuclear weapons,
and the added threat of the proliferation of these weapons.
Ghana shares the concerns of the majority of member states
that this body must continue with, and intensify its pressure
for the total elimination of these weapons. For as lung as
27,000 nuclear weapons continue to exist, as they do now,
our world will remain vulnerable to the threat of mass destruction.
“Madam President, we make this appeal not unaware of
the positive uses of nuclear energy. But, for as long as those
nations which already possess these weapons and those on the
verge of breaking into the mastery of the technology do not
show transparency with their know-how, the world will feel
insecure. So Ghana appeals to such nations to show candour
and transparency in their co-operation with the International
Atomic Energy Commission by their compliance with the terms
of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.”
Arms: “Madam President, the spread of Small
Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) is yet another scourge, especially
for Africa. This Organization's collective efforts to rein
in this menace since 2001 have indeed yielded significant
results. However, we are still far from achieving the desired
target. This is borne out by the outcome of the recent Review
Conference of the UN Programme of Action. Ghana therefore
welcomes the current momentum within the international community
to move closer to the ultimate goal of drastically removing
the menace.”
Switzerland
H.E. Mr. Moritz Leuenberger,
President
September 19, 2006
Terrorism: “We have no other choice than to
take a stand against a clash of cultures through a dialogue
of cultures and religions. Humiliation and a lack of respect
between cultures also serve as breeding grounds for terrorism.
In no way do we want to wipe away the differences between
civilisations. The world thrives on these differences and
its diversity is what makes it so worthwhile and appealing.
Equally important though is that we recognise the dignity
of each culture and what we have in common. As a global forum,
the UN makes a vital contribution in that respect. I look
forward to the report of the High Level Group on the Alliance
of Civilisations. Switzerland will be glad to actively participate
in its implementation.”
Nuclear Weapons/Multilateralism: “Over the
past year, we have celebrated the 50th anniversary of the
death of Albert Einstein, the originator of the Theory of
Relativity. He recommended the construction of the atomic
bomb to President Roosevelt, yet always described himself
a 'militant pacifist'. He shared his qualms of conscience
with Sigmund Freud. In the course of their correspondence
entitled "Why War?", they came to the conclusion that in order
to achieve the peaceful coexistence of mankind on this planet,
the world needed an organisation uniting all nations with
which people could identify. The empathy towards that organisation
could provide it with the authority to counter war. It was
with this conviction that many Swiss citizens voted in favour
of Switzerland's accession to the UN five years ago.”
Multilateralism/Terrorism: “Only through a
common alliance of all nations do we have this opportunity.
No country is capable of solving today's global challenges
alone. War, terrorism, drug trafficking, the offshoring of
jobs or environmental and climate-related disasters are all
global threats. They know no borders, not even those of powerful
nations. No State is the master of its own fate, not even
a strong State. The strongest is not most powerful alone.
Only through an inclusive network with universally applicable
norms can might be replaced by justice. The UN has been the
world's most successful effort to achieve this.”
Terrorism: “The international community hast
to fight terrorism. However, in selecting the means to achieve
that aim, namely the rule of law, it must not renounce those
principles. Torture is the most radical form of its negation
and renders it bereft of its legitimacy. And the Geneva Conventions
are no hindrance to fighting terrorism, in fact quite the
contrary. If the appropriate instruments are lacking, then
new ones can be created such as the conventions on terrorism.
But this struggle can only be credible if human rights are
respected in its pursuit.”
Terrorism: “The cause of every military conflict
and every terrorist attack can ultimately also be traced back
to economic inequalities. They are the source of all tensions
on our earth. That is why we must do our utmost to fight poverty,
economic despair and political apathy. Religious conflicts
too have economic inequalities at their root. The main divide
and at the same time the main cause of all agitations is that
between north and south. If we want religious tolerance, we
must find a way of bringing about economic justice. The world
defined its aims for poverty reduction until 2015 in the Millennium
Development Goals. We must make sure that we enable the UN
and ourselves to keep that promise.”
Nuclear: “The conflict in the Middle East,
the stabilisation of Iraq and the resolution of the (atomic)
crisis with Iran can be addressed through dialogue. All parties
should avoid inflaming these conflicts. Just as central as
dialogue is respect for the basic principles of the UN Charter.
As such, no State may deny the right of another to exist.
Aspirations to the right of self-determination must not be
disappointed if they are based on a valid legal order.”
Honduras
H.E. Mr. José Manuel
Zelaya Rosales, President
September 19, 2006
Available in Spanish only.
Cyprus
H.E. Mr. Tassos Papadopoulos, President
September 19, 2006
Terrorism, disarmament,
non-proliferation, multilateralism: “Then there
are those aspects of reform that continue to elude us, such
as Security Council reform and a comprehensive convention
against terrorism; aspects of it that remain in progress such
as management reform, mandate review and system-wide coherence;
and challenges that are increasingly more difficult to tackle,
such as disarmament and non-proliferation. In this regard
I would like to commend you, Madam President, for choosing
the realisation of the development goals as the theme of your
Presidency in recognition of their enduring importance. My
Government considers that concerted, innovative multilateral
action to eradicate the scourges deriving from poverty and
underdevelopment can yield substantial results.”
Multilateralism:
”The establishment of the Peace-Building Commission
and the Human Rights Council, alongside other impo rtant achievements.
constitutes an impo rtant building block towards a consolidated
international system based on effective multilateralism.”
“Cyprus had from the very first moment of the outbreak
of violence suppo rted the calls for an immediate ceasefire
and joined in the effort to provide assistance both to the
Lebanese people and to evacuees. Unfortunately, it took almost
a month for the Security Council to discharge its responsibilities
effectively towards the peoples of the region, causing disappointment
and frustration. In our search for UN-centered effective multilateralism
, the lessons learned from this crisis should be a strong
guiding force. We hope that the expanded UNIFIL, to whose
deployment, operations and support Cyprus has unde rtaken
to contribute, will be effective in preventing future eruptions
of violence.”
Costa
Rica
H.E. Mr. Óscar Arias
Sánchez, President
September 19, 2006
Disarmament: “For quite some time I have argued
that the struggle for human development is connected to the
struggle for disarmament and demilitarization. Certainly it
is not a badge of honor for our species that global military
spending has exceeded one trillion dollars in 2005, the same
statistic that we had in real terms at the end of the Cold
War and eight times the annual investment necessary to achieve
in a decade all the Millenium Development Goals in every country
on Earth. The investment that the most industrialized nations
make in their militaries—and they are responsible for
83% of global military spending—is ten times the resources
that they dedicate to official development assistance. For
the United States, the richest country on the planet, the
amount they spend on their military is at very least 25 times
as much as they give in aid. What is this but an eloquent
demonstration of twisted priorities and the most profound
irrationality?
“Because, at the end of the day, rationality counts.
Since the tragic events of the 11 th of September 2001, a
little more than 200 billion dollars have been added to global
military spending. There is not a single indicator that suggests
that this colossal increase is making the world more secure
and human rights more widely enjoyed. On the contrary, we
feel more and more vulnerable and fragile. Maybe it is time
to think of other ways to deploy those resources. Maybe it
is time to realize that with much less than that sum we could
guarantee access to potable water and primary education for
every person in the world, and maybe there would be enough
left over, as Gabriel Garcia Marquez once suggested, para
perfumer de sandalo en un día de otoño las cataratas
del Niagara—roughly translated, to perfume the waters
of Niagara Falls on one autumn day. Maybe it is time to understand
that all this is what would really make us happier and more
secure.”
Arms: “With optimism and vehemence I propose
to this Assembly that we take, today, three courses of action
that can have powerful effects on the wellbeing of all people.
First, we must denounce military spending, the arms race and
the arms trade as offensive to the human condition.”
Arms/Weapons: “Every arm is a visible sign
of the delay in meeting the needs of the poor. I am not the
only one to say so. It was said, in memorable fashion, by
a man of arms, President Eisenhower, nearly half a century
ago: "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every
rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those
who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not
clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It
is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists,
the hopes of its children."
“But if it is sad that the richest nations, through
military spending, are denying development opportunities to
the most poor, it is worse still that the poor are complicit
in destroying their own future. In effect, it is tragic that
the governments of some of the most underdeveloped countries
continue to hoard tanks, troops, warplanes and missiles to
supposedly protect a population gripped with hunger and ignorance.
“My region of the world has not escaped that phenomenon.
In 2005, the countries of Latin America spent almost 24 billion
dollars on weapons and troops, an amount that has risen 25%
in real terms over the last decade and that has risen substantially
in the last year. Latin America has begun a new arms race,
even though it has never been more democratic and there have
been very few military conflicts between countries in the
last century. But for avoiding this impulse, I believe Costa
Ricans have reason to be proud. Since 1948, due to the vision
of the wise ex-President José Figueres, Costa Rica
abolished its army and declared peace on the world.
“As was the case twenty years ago in my first message
to this General Assembly, today I can say to you with satisfaction
that I come from a country without weapons, that our children
have seen neither a tank nor attack helicopter, neither warship
nor cannon. I can say to you that in my country, fathers and
grandfathers explain to the youth the curious architecture
of our schools, in terms that attest to the fact that long
ago those schools were military barracks. I can say to you
that in my homeland, none of our citizens, man or woman, knows
oppression, and that there is not a single Costa Rican that
lives in exile. I can say to you today that mine is a nation
of liberty.
“Costa Rican children always have marched to school
with books under their arms and never with rifles on their
shoulders. If the old refrain is true, "When a school opens,
a jail closes," then Costa Rica also believes that "when a
barrack closes, a school opens." Each time a soldier sheds
his military fatigues, it allows for many children to put
on the uniforms of their schools.
“This is a road that neither my country nor I are willing
to abandon. And not only that: it is a road that we wish all
humanity to follow. And so, today I would like to propose
an idea. I propose to you that we all give life to the Costa
Rica Consensus, through which we create mechanisms to forgive
debt and give international financial support to developing
nations that invest more and more in education, health and
housing, and less and less in soldiers and weapons. It is
time that the international financial community reward not
only those whose spending is orderly, as it has done till
now, but also those whose spending is ethical. I propose to
you as well, that we approve as soon as possible an Arms Trade
Treaty that prohibits countries from transferring weapons
to states, groups or individuals if there is reason to believe
that these arms will be used to violate human rights or international
law, or if there are clear indications that they will be used
to harm sustainable development.
“I hope that the United Nations, in these sessions of
its General Assembly, approves the formation of a governmental
group of experts that will write the text of a binding treaty
on the subject of international arms transfers.
“If it is time to close the doors on the arms trade
and on its infinite wake of death, it is time to open the
door on the other form of commerce, legitimate and licit,
on which the prosperity of the peoples of the world depends.”
Multilateralism: “In effect, the third big
challenge that I want to mention today is the challenge of
strengthening global governance and reforming its institutions.
This task begins with the defense of multilateralism, with
the strict adherence of all countries to international law
and the fundamental principles of the UN Charter, the most
elemental safeguard against anarchy in the world. Costa Rica,
as it lacks an army, is perhaps the country that most needs
an effective international system to guarantee its security.
As such, it is willing to put into the service of this cause
all the weight of its example as a disarmed country. But there
is a lot left to be done.
“It is essential that the most powerful nations on Earth
understand that the supervision of international law and the
United Nations is fundamental for their own security, that
the mere existence of this forum is one of the great achievements
of our species, that the UN is a victory of hope over fear,
of tolerance over fanaticism, of reason over force.”
Arms/Multilateralism: “If today we do not
confront the rise in military spending and the arms trade;
if we do not stimulate the economies of the poorest countries
who invest their resources in life and not in death; if we
do not conquer the fears and the hypocrisy that impede truly
free trade in the world; if we do not strengthen the institutions
and the international norms that protect us against global
anarchy; if we do not do all this, we condemn ourselves to
walk on the edge of a cliff, to live on the wheel of eternal
return, descending like Sisyphus after every peak reached.”
Latvia
H.E. Mrs. Vaira Vike-Freiberga,
President
September 20, 2006
Security/terrorism:
“We have had the great misfortune to see terrorism continue
as a threat to international peace and security. I welcome
therefore the recent agreement on a Global Counter Terrorism
Strategy and urge the UN's member States to intensify their
efforts to reach a consensus on a Comprehensive Anti-Terrorism
Convention.”
Nonproliferation/disarmament/weapons
of mass destructions/security: “It is regrettable
that we have failed to make any substantial progress over
the last year in the area of disarmament and the non-proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction. This is a fundamental issue
for global peace and security and I encourage all UN member
States to demonstrate their willingness to move forward at
a faster pace.”
Security: “The
UN also needs to provide a prompt and effective response when
armed conflicts arise. We must strive to make UN peacekeeping
a more effective and accepted instrument of collective security.”
“Along with the promotion of peace and security and
the alleviation of poverty, the protection of human rights
is one of the main missions of the United Nations. The recent
creation of the Human Rights Council will hopefully enable
the UN to respond more promptly and effectively in situations
where human rights come under threat.”
“The Security Council has a central role to play in
maintaining international peace and security. If it is to
truly function as an effective organ, then it must attain
both a stronger capacity and a greater willingness to act
in the face of international crises and tensions and find
ways of responding more rapidly at the outbreak of armed conflicts.”
Terrorism: “The
world needs a strong UN and we as leaders need to build bridges
of understanding, if we are to make the UN as strong as it
needs to be. We need to keep alive the main goal of the founders
of the United Nations, who were determined "to save succeeding
generations from the scourge of war". We owe it to our children
who will inherit this planet, to save them also from the scourge
of terrorism, of hunger and of disease.”
El
Salvador
H.E. Mr. Elías Antonio Saca González,
President
September 19, 2006
Available
in Spanish only.
Suriname
H.E. Mr. Runaldo Ronald Venetiaan, President
September 19, 2006
Weapons: “In this connection the Government
of Suriname will host an Anti- Narcotics Conference in October
2006. The main purpose of this Conference is to enhance coordination
and collaboration among the participating countries aimed
at combating trafficking in narcotic drugs, dismantling drug
related criminal organizations and combating the illicit trade
in small and light weapons given the increased levels of crime
it generates.”
Security/Multilateralism: “Given the less than
satisfactory international development and security situations,
we, the member states of the United Nations, should be more
than willing, to act in conformity with the United Nations
Charter and to employ the international machinery for the
promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples;
to unite our strength to maintain international peace and
security, and to practice increased tolerance and live together
in peace with one another as good neighbours.”
Terrorism: “Recently the General Assembly adopted
the United Nations global counter terrorism strategy. Certainly
this is a step forward in arriving at an effective international
response against terrorism, in conformity with international
law, international human rights and international humanitarian
law.
“My delegation notes with satisfaction that this strategy
includes the promotion of dialogue, tolerance and understanding
among civilizations.
“Of equal importance is the recognition that capacity
building in all states is a core element of the global counter
terrorism effort. In this regard we anticipate that a genuine
partnership be established to implement this strategy.”
Bolivia
H.E. Mr. Evo Morales Aima, President
September 19, 2006
Statement is not available.
Iran
(The Islamic Republic of)
H.E. Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President
September 19, 2006
Nuclear/Weapons/Proliferation: “Some powers
proudly announce their production of second and third generations
of nuclear weapons. What do they need these weapons for? Is
the development and stockpiling of these deadly weapons designed
to promote peace and democracy? Or, are these weapons, in
fact, instruments of coercion and threat against other peoples
and governments? How long should the people of the world live
with the nightmare of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons?
What bounds the powers producing and possessing these weapons?
How can they be held accountable before the international
community? And, are the inhabitants of these countries content
with the waste of their wealth and resources for the production
of such destructive arsenals? Is it not possible to rely on
justice, ethics and wisdom instead of these instruments of
death? Aren't wisdom and justice more compatible with peace
and tranquility than nuclear, chemical and biological weapons?
If wisdom, ethics and justice prevail, then oppression and
aggression will be uprooted, threats will wither away and
no reason will remain for conflict. This is a solid proposition
because most global conflicts emanate from injustice, and
from the powerful, not being contented with their own rights,
striving to devour the rights of others.
“People across the globe embrace justice and are willing
to sacrifice for its sake.
“Would it not be easier for global powers to ensure
their longevity and win hearts and minds through the championing
of real promotion of justice, compassion and peace, than through
continuing the proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons
and the threat of their use?
“The experience of the threat and the use of nuclear
weapons is before us. Has it achieved anything for the perpetrators
other than exacerbation of tension, hatred and animosity among
nations?”
Nuclear Energy: “The Islamic Republic of Iran
is a member of the IAEA and is committed to the NPT. All our
nuclear activities are transparent, peaceful and under the
watchful eyes of IAEA inspectors. Why then are there objections
to our legally recognized rights? Which governments object
to these rights? Governments that themselves benefit from
nuclear energy and the fuel cycle. Some of them have abused
nuclear technology for non-peaceful ends including the production
of nuclear bombs, and some even have a bleak record of using
them against humanity.”
Nuclear Weapons: “Threats with nuclear weapons
and other instruments of war by some powers have taken the
place of respect for the rights of nations and the maintenance
and promotion of peace and tranquility;”
Terrorism: “It seems that intensification
of hostilities and terrorism serves as a pretext for the continued
presence of foreign forces in Iraq.”
Security: “Who can ensure Iraq's security?
Insecurity in Iraq affects the entire region. Can the Security
Council play a role in restoring peace and security in Iraq,
while the occupiers are themselves permanent members of the
Council? Can the Security Council adopt a fair decision in
this regard?”
Security/Weapons: “Some seek to rule the world
relying on weapons and threats, while others live in perpetual
insecurity and danger. “
Security: “Occupation of countries, including
Iraq, has continued for the last three years. Not a day goes
by without hundreds of people getting killed in cold blood.
The occupiers are incapable of establishing security in Iraq.
Despite the establishment of the lawful Government and National
Assembly of Iraq, there are covert and overt efforts to heighten
insecurity, magnify and aggravate differences within Iraqi
society, and instigate civil strife.
“There is no indication that the occupiers have the
necessary political will to eliminate the sources of instability.
Numerous terrorists were apprehended by the Government of
Iraq, only to be let loose under various pretexts by the occupiers.”
Security: “The pretexts for the creation of
the regime occupying Al-Qods Al-Sharif are so weak that its
proponents want to silence any voice trying to merely speak
about them, as they are concerned that shedding light on the
facts would undermine the raison d'être of this regime,
as it has. The tragedy does not end with the establishment
of a regime in the territory of others. Regrettably, from
its inception, that regime has been a constant source of threat
and insecurity in the Middle East region, waging war and spilling
blood and impeding the progress of regional countries, and
has also been used by some powers as an instrument of division,
coercion, and pressure on the people of the region. Reference
to these historical realities may cause some disquiet among
supporters of this regime. But these are sheer facts and not
myth. History has
unfolded before our eyes.”
Security: “Some permanent members of the Security
Council, even when they are themselves parties to international
disputes, conveniently threaten others with the Security Council
and declare, even before any decision by the Council, the
condemnation of their opponents by the Council. The question
is: what can justify such exploitation of the Security Council,
and doesn't it erode the credibility and effectiveness of
the Council? Can such behavior contribute to the ability of
the Council to maintain security?”
Security: “Apparently the Security Council
can only be used to ensure the security and the rights of
some big powers. But when the oppressed are decimated under
bombardment, the Security Council must remain aloof and not
even call for a ceasefire. Is this not a tragedy of historic
proportions for the Security Council, which is charged with
maintaining the security of countries?”
Security/Multilateralism: “Regrettably, the
persistence of some hegemonic powers in imposing their exclusionist
policies on international decision making mechanisms, including
the Security Council, has resulted in a growing mistrust in
global public opinion, undermining the credibility and effectiveness
of this most universal system of collective security.”
Security: “Justice and protection of human
dignity are the two pillars in maintaining sustainable peace,
security and tranquility in the world.”
Security: “All nations and states are entitled
to peace, progress and security.”
Paraguay
H.E. Mr. Nicanor Duarte Frutos,
President
September 19, 2006
Available in Spanish only.
Sudan
H.E. Mr. Omer Hassan Al-Bashir,
President
September 19, 2006
Available in Arabic only.
Norway
H.E. Mr. Jens Stoltenberg,
Prime Minister
September 19, 2006
Terrorism: "The UN
is now more the centre of international affairs than it has
been for many years. We see the Secretary-General and his
staff driving diplomacy. They are on the ground, moving peace
efforts in the Middle East. They are coordinating and sustaining
peace operations in Lebanon. The UN is drawing up mandates
and getting ready for new, urgent assignments, such as Darfur.
The UN is assisting countries coming out of conflict, such
as Burundi and Sierra Leone. Giving legitimacy and protection
under international law to soldiers and civilians in Afghanistan.
And launching a Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy.”
Kiribati
H.E. Ms. Teima Onorio,
Vice-President
September 19, 2006
Security/terrorism/proliferation/weapons
of mass destruction/small arms/light weapons: “Peace
and security in this world of ours remains elusive with the
on-going conflicts and the threat of new conflicts around
the world. Terrorism continues to plague us despite the best
of concerted and collective efforts. Still more needs to be
done to remove the threat posed by the proliferation of weapons
of mass destruction. And while some progress has been made
towards addressing the threat posed by the continuing illicit
trade in small arms and light weapons, further work is needed
to eliminate this threat.”
Multilateralism:
“We note the progress that has been made with regard
to reforming the United Nations. Understandably, we would
have liked to see greater progress having been made by now
but we fully recognize the need for more discussions on the
various issues.
And that is multilateralism in practice. The debate on unilateralism
versus multilateralism in world affairs continues unabated.
We see multilateralism in full play in the debate in reforming
the UN. We consider this a reflection of the healthy interest
each member country has in the organization. Indeed, in this
day and age multilateralism would seem the more appropriate
approach than unilateralism.”
Security: “Consisting
of low-lying coral atolls, Kiribati is particularly vulnerable
to the impact of global warming and sea level rise. For countries
such as Kiribati global warming and sea level rise are critical
security issues.”
“…those member states that are major contributors
to UN programmes, especially towards the maintenance of global
peace and security should be accorded permanent membership
of the Security Council.”
“The continuing desire by many to join this organization
attests to the value and continued relevance of the United
Nations. I note, therefore, with much disappointment and regret
that the desire of the 23 million people of Taiwan to join
this organization of ours continues to be rejected. This is
despite Taiwan's demonstrated ability, willingness and commitment
to contribute to international collaborative efforts in the
pursuit of global peace and security.”
Afghanistan
H.E. Mr. Hâmid KARZAI,
President
September 20, 2006
Terrorism: "We have
seen terrorism rebounding as terrorists have infiltrated our
borders to step up their murderous campaign against our people.
Terrorism sees, in the prosperity of the Afgan people, its
ultimate defeat."
"…terrorists are preventing children from access to
vaccination and healthcare. Terrorists are prepared to cross
any boundaries, and commit horrific acts of violence to try
to derail Afghanistan from its path to success ; they want
the international community to fail in its collective endeavour
to help Afghanistan to rebuild.
…
Clearly, unless we confront them more decisively, terrorists
will continue to take lives and to inflict greater damage.
To be sure, madam President, terrorism does not emanate from
within Afghanistan ; Afghanistan is its worst victim ! Military
action in Afghanistan alone, therefore, will not deliver our
shared goal of eliminating terrorism. We must look beyond
Afghanistan to the sources of terrorism. We must destroy terrorist
sanctuaries beyond Afghanistan, dismantle the elaborate networks
in the region that recruit, indoctrinate, train, finance,
arm and deploy terrorists. We must ensure that political currents
and entities in the region are not allowed to use extremism
as an instrument of policy.
Madam President, fighting terrorism is also tied to our fighting
against narcotics. The menace of narcotics feeds terrorism
and threatens the foundation of legitimate economic development
in Afghanistan.
…
Madam President, in the context of the United Nations role
in enhancing global security, we endorse recommendations of
the Secretary General for a comprehensive counter-terrorism
strategy, and welcome the recent adoption of the strategy
by the General Assembly. We also express our support to the
proposal for convening a high-level conference on international
terrorism, with a view to concluding the draft conprehensive
convention on international terrorism at the earliest possible
opportunity.
…
We will honour the sacrifices [that the men and women in uniform,
from around forty countries in the world, have made in the
fight against terrorism in Afghanistan] by remaining true
to our vision of building a secure, democratic and prosperous
Afghanistan that will contribute to the progress of our region
and security of the world at large."
Panama
H.E. Mr. Martín Torrijos, President
September 20, 2006
Available in Spanish only.
Chile
H.E. Mrs. Michelle Bachelet Jeria, President
September 20, 2006
Multilateralism: “We wish to reaffirm our
commitment to international law and institutions. Only through
them shall we be able to build this fairer and more integrated
wold of which we dream, where large and small coexist in peace
and harmony.”
Disarmament/Multilateralism/Security: “The
most serious failure of the 2005 Summit was its silence on
the multilateral disarmament agenda. Chile bases its multilateral
foreign policy on the principle that collective security is
indivisible. We all have a share of responsibility to preserve
peace and international security that cannot be delegated.
For this reason, Chile has joined in efforts to revitalize
the disarmamament agenda and move towards prohibition of the
use of fissile material for military purposes.”
Security: “The security of States is linked
to the security of the human beings making up those States,
because it allows the exercise of freedom. United Nations
should develop the concept of human security.”
Terrorism: “Terrorism negates these freedoms
and runs counter to the values that we share. Accordingly,
we support the advance of United Nations reform in the area
of counter-terrorism. But terrorism must be combated in democracy.
Whenever we restrict constitutional guarantees and yield to
the temptation to employ illegal methods to fight terrorism,
we are handing a victory to its proponents, because only then
do they succeed in threatening the spirit of our democracies.”
Sri
Lanka
H. E. Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa, President
September 20, 2006
Security: “The Preamble of the UN Charter
requires that we "unite our strength to maintain international
peace and security".
Let us all, members of the United Nations, focus sharply on
this commitment. Let us dedicate ourselves to its realization.
And let us mobilise our collective energies towards the achievement
of peace and security world wide.”
Terrorism: “Madam President, however, Sri
Lanka's dream is threatened by the terrible affliction which
impedes development, undermines democracy and challenges fundamental
freedoms. I refer to the bane of terrorism which confronts
my country and many other countries of the world. I wish to
reaffirm my government's firm commitment to supporting all
global efforts to combat terrorism whenever and wherever it
raises its ugly head.
“Terrorism has become closely intertwined with organized
crime. It is now directly linked with people smuggling, the
trade in illicit drugs, the illegal trade in small arms and
money laundering. Terrorism is a major impediment to development
and poses a terrible challenge to civilized society. We support
all measures undertaken in the UN to meet this challenge.
We have ratified all UN Conventions in this regard.
“In our capacity as Chair of the Ad-hoc Committee on
Measures to Eliminate International Terrorism, we shall spare
no effort to realize the international legal framework
to facilitate our common struggle against terrorism. It is
our fervent hope that the Comprehensive Convention on International
Terrorism will soon become a reality.”
Arms: “The illicit trade and trafficking of
small arms and light weapons, has contributed to the escalation
of many local conflicts, due to the easy availability of arms
for non-State actors. Sri Lanka is concerned that despite
the commitment of the international community to wipe out
this menace, the impact at ground level throughout the world,
is limited. We hope that the UN Plan of Action on this matter
will be fully implemented, and its scope further expanded
in the future.”
Terrorism: “With regard to terrorism, I speak
with personal experience in my own country. Exploiting minority
|