| Mr. President,
Since this is the first time that I have asked for the floor during
your presidency, allow me to begin by expressing the appreciation
of the Chinese delegation for your unrelenting efforts to facilitate
the early start of substantive work of the CD. I would also like
to extend our gratitude to your predecessor, Ambassador Draganov,
for the valuable endeavor he has made to help overcome the difficulties
within this organization. Furthermore, I would like to take this
opportunity to pay tribute to our Secretary-General Mr. Petrovsky,
our new Deputy Secretary-General Mr. Roman-Morey and the staff of
the CD Secretariat whose hard work and good service deserve high
appreciation from all of us. At the midnight striking of the bell
on New Year's Eve, mankind has entered the 21st century. The past
century has experienced unprecedented social, cultural and economic
development worldwide. It has also however, witnessed the untold
sufferings of mankind in countless wars and conflicts. Reflecting
on the past in the light of the present, mankind cannot aspire more
for building and preserving lasting peace, common security and universal
development in the 21st century. We firmly believe that only through
mutual understanding, accommodation, respect, coordination and cooperation
can all countries in the world join hands to maintain peace and
security and achieve development and prosperity. The old security
concept based on military alliances and buildup of armaments aimed
at seeking absolute security for one country at the expense of other
countries' interests should be discarded. The 21st century needs
a new security concept. The core of such a concept should be mutual
respect, mutual benefit, equality, cooperation and resolving disputes
through dialogue.
Mr. President,
The Chinese government has all along pursued an independent foreign
policy on peace. It attaches importance to and actively participates
in, ongoing efforts of the international community to promote just
and rational arms control and disarmament. In the new century, China
will stick to its set of principles, positions and proposals such
as preserving strategic security stability, promoting nuclear disarmament
and preventing the weaponization of and an arms race in outer space.
It will continue to honor its international commitments. China is
ready to make greater efforts to safeguard enduring peace and common
security of all countries in the world.
Mr. President,
Nuclear weapons were invented by mankind in the 20th century. We
believe that they can also be eliminated by mankind in the 21st
century. The final document adopted by the 2000 NPT Review Conference
bears great importance and significance in guiding and promoting
the non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament process. We believe
that progress in nuclear disarmament hinges on preserving global
strategic balance and stability as well as on insuring undiminished
security for all countries. Countries with the largest nuclear arsenals
should continue to reduce their respective nuclear arsenals both
dramatically and irreversibly. As a nuclear weapon state, China
never evades its responsibilities and obligations regarding nuclear
disarmament. In fact, China has made unique contributions to the
international nuclear disarmament course through its sound nuclear
weapon policies as well as its positions and proposals on nuclear
disarmament. The Chinese government has always stood for the complete
prohibition and destruction of all nuclear weapons. In 1994, the
Chinese Vice-Premier and then Foreign Minister Mr. Qian Qichen proposed
at the UN general assembly that the international community should
negotiate and conclude a treaty banning nuclear weapons. We hope
that a treaty will be concluded at an early date in the new century.
China has actively participated in any negotiation of the (CTBT)
and was among the first batch of countries to sign a treaty. The
Chinese government has already submitted a treaty to China's National
People's Congress for ratification. We continue to urge that all
nuclear weapon states undertake not to be the first to use nuclear
weapons at any time and under any circumstances and that they unconditionally
commit themselves never to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons
against non-nuclear weapon states. These should be codified into
solemn international legal instruments. At the same time nuclear
weapon states should also withdraw their nuclear weapons to their
own territories and forego the policies and practice of nuclear
sharing a nuclear umbrella. They should preserve the ABM Treaty
and check the trend of weaponization of outer space as the most
urgent and imperative task of today. It is also indispensable for
the followup steps that are specified in the 2000 document of the
NPT Review Conference to proceed on how to deal with nuclear disarmament
in the CD. The Chinese delegation is in favor of the proposal put
forth by the Group of 21 in C D/1570 and CD/1571. China also supports
the early negotiation and conclusion of FMCT on the premise that
the global strategic stability is maintained and a nuclear disarmament
process is further pursued.
Mr. President,
The ABM Treaty is the cornerstone of preserving global strategic
stability. Its significance is far beyond the scope of US-Russia
bilateral relationship and has a direct bearing on the security
of all countries. The ABM treaty should be strictly observed. Any
attempt to undermine the integrity and effectiveness of the treaty
by whatever excuses will bring far reaching negative consequences
to international peace and security. The general assembly has for
two consecutive years overwhelmingly adopted the resolution on the
preservation of and compliance with the ABM Treaty. This demonstrates
the will and determination of the international community to maintain
global strategic balance and stability and its clear position against
the development and deployment of national missile defense systems.
It is a common aspiration of mankind to use outer space, the heritage
of all peoples, for peaceful purposes. However the missile defense
systems currently under development, pose a serious danger of outer
space weaponization, which might trigger off a new arms race. We're
seriously concerned about the report of a space war exercise, which
took place late last month. The exercise uses the outer space as
a battlefield and the scenario was set to happen in 2017.
Anti-satellite weapons, strategic missile defense systems and land-based
laser weapons were envisaged in the exercise to attack targets in
space and space weapons to launch preventive strikes. This has irrefutably
demonstrated that weaponization of outer space is imminent. Therefore,
it has become a top priority task for the international community
to take evasive measures to prevent the weaponization of and arms
race in outer space. China urges all countries, those with great
space capabilities in particular, to strictly abide by all relevant
international conventions and arms race and disarmament agreements
including bilateral ones concerning other states. It is urgent for
each and every country concerned, to stop all the activities that
contravene the principles of peaceful use of outer space. What is
of particular importance, the CD in Geneva should immediately reestablish
an Ad hoc committee under the agenda item of prevention of an arms
race in outer space, to negotiate and conclude an international
legal instruments preventing the weaponization of and an arms race
in outer space as urged by the relevant UN resolutions with a view
to remedying the deficiencies in the existing international regime.
We are deeply worried over the fact that in recent years the very
country conducting the abovementioned space war exercise and weaponizing
outer space has single handedly obstructed the PAROS negotiations
in the CD by denying the risk of the weaponization of and an arms
race in outer space. By doing so, it will only make all countries
suffer, undermining the interest of others without benefiting itself.
Mr. President,
Since the end of the Cold War the international community has made
a consistent effort to prevent the production of weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivery. Facts have shown that to
promote the non-proliferation process within a framework of collective
security and to conduct consultation, dialogue and cooperation on
an equal footing have proven to be the correct and effective way
to address the problem of proliferation of WMD and their means of
delivery. On the other hand, it is totally unacceptable to create
any unilateral or small group regimes offsetting global resistance
or to impose in the name of non-proliferation, unjustified economic
or other types of sanctions on other countries. This can only undermine
the object of non-proliferation. Nonproliferation is aimed at enhancing
the equality of security of all countries. It must not be used as
a tool for stronger or larger countries, to control weaker or smaller
ones. Nor should it become an instrument for a handful of countries
to obstruct the building of national defense of most countries in
order to enhance and form its own advantages in a search of domination.
The practice of playing double standards should not be allowed in
non-proliferation. A certain country vigorously promoting negotiations
of nonproliferation to guard against other countries and is far
more concerned about the nonproliferation measures of other countries
than about its own. This in time willfully acts regarding the existing
arms control and disarmament agreements, making disguised reservations
to legislation, rejecting eradication or even threatening to withdraw.
Such action will severely undermine the confidence of the international
community and arms control and non-proliferation efforts. Needless
to say, introducing weapons and military means into outer space
or other new sphere and seeking ones own absolute security and superiority
at the expense of all others, will certainly destroy all international
nonproliferation efforts.
Mr. President,
Three months ago, someone alleged that the impasse in the CD should
be attributed to China. Holding sessions hostage or creating linkages
is a distortion of facts. Today, it is all the more evident to everyone
that a threat to strategic stability and the introduction of weapons
and an arms race into outer space constitutes the root cause for
the stalemate in the CD during the recent two years. It is simply
logic that every agenda item addressed by the CD is closely related
to security and that all aspects of security are inseparable. Therefore
each agenda item cannot but be inherently linked to other items.
The priorities of all parties should be equally valued. Negotiations
can never be conducted for the benefit of one party while undermining
the interests of others. We sincerely hope that a relevant delegation
will take into consideration not only its own concerns but also
the concerns of other countries. Nuclear disarmament is not only
a mirror reflecting international security situation but also a
means of promoting international arms control and disarmament. We
should not negotiate for negotiations sake and what's more, we must
never only offer lip service without negotiation. The CD is duty
bound to eliminate or reduce the threat to peace and security by
conducting serious negotiations to solve the serious problems facing
the international community and through arms control and disarmament.
Undoubtedly, international arms control and disarmament efforts
are currently at a crossroad. The most outstanding calls for preventing
the attempt to overthrow the ABM Treaty and weaponize outer space.
Under such circumstances to formulate a comprehensive and fairest
program of work and start negotiations on such issues as PAROS,
nuclear disarmament, FMCT and negative security assurances, is not
only the obligation of the CD, but also the only possible way to
break the current stalemate and achieve progress. The Chinese delegation
supports the Amorim proposal as a basis for further consultation
and is ready to make further efforts to reach a comprehensive and
balanced approach to reach a program of work.
Thank you Mr. President.
|