Home About News Action Donate Contact
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
Conference on Disarmament
General Assembly First Committee
UN Disarmament Commission
Special Session on Disarmament
Other...
Critical Issues
Publications
Treaties
NGO Contacts
Government Contacts
Calendar
Other...
Join

SSOD IV
Arguments and appeals for SSOD IV

Recent public appeals for SSOD IV:

Global Action to Prevent War
Meeting of the Open-ended working group on SSOD IV
28 August 2007

On August 28, Waverly de Bruijn, International Coordinator for Global Action to Prevent War, advised members on Global Action's positions vis a vis disarmament and international security and answered questions regarding the value of and NGO advocacy for an SSOD IV.

Dear Mr. Chair, Distinguished panelists of the open-ended working group, and fellow NGO colleagues,

I am pleased to be a part of discussions today as the representative for Global Action to Prevent War. Indeed, discussions on the merits and scope of a Fourth special session on disarmament are linked rather closely with our organizational objectives. Founded in 1998, we are an organization devoted to charting the course towards a global climate where inter-state war and internal armed conflict become increasingly rare and easily mitigated. Our broad and comprehensive Program Statement is divided into phases over the next 3-4 decades and deals with conflict prevention, strengthening the rule of law, nuclear and conventional disarmament, and building a culture of non-violence. The Program Statement is meant to enhance and mutually strengthen the work of governments and NGOs on particular areas of this larger program.

Specifically in the field of disarmament, I recognize that virtually all agenda items put forth by member states for a possible fourth special session on disarmament, from small arms and light weapons to outer space, are addressed in the Global Action Program as disarmament issues of vital importance. In particular, Global Action stresses the important link between nuclear disarmament and mutually negotiated reductions in national holdings of conventional weapons. The benefits of this link are clear: by reducing the acquisition and holdings of conventional weapons, states both free up significant sources of funding which could be redirected into domestic health or education, while building confidence in a global process of disarmament that includes nuclear weapons.

It is this linkage that, were it addressed substantively in a 4th special session on disarmament, would make a significant and valuable step forward in an area of great concern that has not seen as much attention in international disarmament machinery as it warrants.

A related area in which we feel a 4th SSOD could positively impact current initiatives includes the creation of an Arms Trade Treaty. The objective of establishing international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional arms has gained tremendous support from governments and civil society in the past years, indicating that it is an area where movement could significantly benefit all, from communities to the national and international spheres. All opportunities to discuss and determine common ground for steps towards such a treaty are valuable and should be pursued.

Furthermore, a 4th SSOD should take up discussion on a Nuclear Weapons Convention. Resources can be drawn from the 2007 revised draft Nuclear Weapons Convention in the publication “Securing Our Survival (SOS): The Case for a Nuclear Weapons Convention,” compiled by the International Association for Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and the International Network of Engineers and Scientists Against Proliferation. If an SSOD IV is formed, it is imperative that movement towards nuclear non-proliferation is re-coupled with the obligations to nuclear disarmament.

There are of course many factors to consider in assessing the feasibility and timing of holding a 4th Special Session on Disarmament and it is by no means an easy task. However challenging, a 4th Special Session could offer a timely opportunity to move forward on a few critical and unresolved areas of disarmament while “re-energizing” processes in other disarmament machinery. Whatever the ultimate outcome, the valuable lessons gleaned from this open-ended working group should be conveyed formally and in as much detail as possible to the General Assembly for review and deliberation.

I thank you all for your willingness and desire to serve in this working group—Global Action to Prevent War will continue to support comprehensive measures towards “General and Complete Disarmament,” and is ready to assist you in your endeavor to make recommendations towards the establishment of a preparatory committee on a 4th Special Session on Disarmament.

Indonesia on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement
UN General Assembly First Committee on Disarmament and International Security
1 November 2007


During this year’s First Committee, many delegations reaffirmed the validity of multilateral diplomacy in the field of disarmament and non-proliferation. They expressed their determination to promote multilateralism as an essential way to develop arms regulations and disarmament negotiations.

In the Final Document adopted by consensus at the conclusion of the SSOD I, the 30th anniversary of which we will be commemorating next year, we stated, among others, that while the final objective of the efforts of all States should continue to be general and complete disarmament under effective international control, the immediate goal is that of the elimination of the danger of nuclear weapons.

In spite of the best efforts of the international community, the existing disarmament machinery has not produced adequate or satisfying results. There is urgent need, therefore, for the revitalization of the machinery and forum appropriately constituted for disarmament deliberations and negotiations. This should begin with the strengthening of the role and responsibility of the United Nations in the sphere of disarmament, in accordance with The Charter. The way towards this, we believe, is through the convening of the fourth special session of the General Assembly devoted to disarmament (SSOD-IV).

Mr. Chairman,

In our view, the convening of SSOD-IV is both timely and appropriate, for the following reasons:

  • It can set the future course of action and a balanced approach to reaching a new consensus in arms control, disarmament, non-proliferation and related international security matters, including a comprehensive review of the disarmament machinery.
  • There is a need to address the existing and new threats to international peace and security in a comprehensive and transparent manner with the broad participation of all Member States;
  • In view of these unprecedented threat and challenges, concerted multilateral efforts under the only auspices which offer the only legitimate and lasting solutions has become imperative, and the United Nations should play a more effective role;
  • There is a general agreement among member states on the need to revitalize the disarmament machinery, including the First Committee, the UNDC and the CD. They cannot afford to allow its agenda to remain deadlocked. Therefore, the disarmament agenda, as contained in the Final Document of SSOD-I should be revived on an urgent basis.

The draft resolution before us contained in document L.17 rev.1 calls for the convening of the Open-ended working group which was established by resolution 60/61 of 6 December 2006 and for it to hold its organizational session in order to schedule its substantive sessions in 2008 and to subsequently submit a report on its work before the end of the 62nd session of the General Assembly.

NAM continues to underline the necessity of working towards the convening of SSOD IV, and reaffirms its strong support of that objective, taking into account the constructive dialogue and active engagement that have existed among Member States, including key delegations, during the 2007 substantive sessions of the OEWG.

In this regard, NAM encourages all Member States to continue to work closely and constructively and to fully utilize the forthcoming substantive sessions of the OEWG to consider the objectives and agenda of SSOD-IV and consequently to support draft resolution L.17 Rev.1.

777 UN Plaza - 6th Floor - New York, NY - 10017 - Ph: 212.682.1265 - Fax: 212.286.8211 - info@reachingcriticalwill.org
This site was created by Kache Productions ©2008