|
Health Effects of the Nuclear Age
Nuclear Explosions:
Weapons Testing and War
"Even a small-scale, regional nuclear war could produce as
many direct fatalities as occurred during all of World War II and
disrupt the global climate for a decade or more, impacting nearly
everyone on Earth: 'For a regional-scale nuclear conflict, fatality
estimates range from 2.6 million to 16.7 million,' said Richard
Turco, professor at UCLA and expert on the environmental effects
of nuclear war. He continued, 'Megacities attacked with nuclear
devices, through war or terrorism, would likely be abandoned indefinitely,
inducing mass migration and long-term economic decline.' Alan Robock,
a professor of environmental sciences at Rutgers, said, 'A cooling
of several degrees would occur over large areas of North America
and Eurasia, including most of the grain-growing regions. As was
the case with earlier nuclear winter calculations, large climatic
effects would occur in regions far removed from the target areas
or the countries involved in the conflict.'" - UCLA
News Release
For a low altitude atmospheric detonation of a moderate sized weapon
in the kiloton range, the energy is distributed roughly as follows:
- 50% as blast;
- 35% as thermal radiation; made up of a wide range of the electromagnetic
spectrum, including infrared, visible, and ultraviolet light and
some soft x-ray emitted at the time of the explosion; and
- 15% as nuclear radiation; including 5% as initial ionizing radiation
consisting chiefly of neutrons and gamma rays emitted within the
first minute after detonation, and 10% as residual nuclear radiation.
Residual nuclear radiation is the hazard in fallout.
Considerable
variation from this distribution will occur with changes in
yield or location of the detonation.
1 Megaton Surface Blast: Pressure Damage
The fission bomb detonated over Hiroshima had an explosive blast
equivalent to 12,500 tons of TNT. A 1 megaton hydrogen bomb, hypothetically
detonated on the earth’s surface, has about 80 times the blast
power of that 1945 explosion.
Radius of destructive circle: 1.7 miles
12 pounds per square inch
At the center lies a crater 200 feet deep and 1000 feet in diameter.
The rim of this crater is 1,000 feet wide and is composed of highly
radioactive soil and debris. Nothing recognizable remains within
about 3,200 feet (0.6 miles) from the center, except, perhaps, the
remains of some buildings’ foundations. At 1.7 miles, only
some of the strongest buildings—those made of reinforced,
poured concrete—are still standing. Ninety-eight percent of
the population in this area are dead.
Radius: 2.7 miles
5 psi
Virtually everything is destroyed between the 12 and 5 psi rings.
The walls of typical multi-story buildings, including apartment
buildings, have been completely blown out. The bare, structural
skeletons of more and more buildings rise above the debris as you
approach the 5 psi ring. Single-family residences within this this
area have been completely blown away—only their foundations
remain. Fifty percent of the population between the 12 and 5 psi
rings are dead. Forty percent are injured.
Radius: 4.7 miles
2 psi
Any single-family residences that have not been completely destroyed
are heavily damaged. The windows of office buildings have been blown
away, as have some of their walls. The contents of these buildings’
upper floors, including the people who were working there, are scattered
on the street. A substantial amount of debris clutters the entire
area. Five percent of the population between the 5 and 2 psi rings
are dead. Forty-five percent are injured.
Radius: 7.4 miles
1 psi
Residences are moderately damaged. Commercial buildings have sustained
minimal damage. Twenty-five percent of the population between the
2 and 1 psi rings have been injured, mainly by flying glass and
debris. Many others have been injured from thermal radiation—the
heat generated by the blast. The remaining seventy-five percent
are unhurt.1
Megaton Surface Blast: Fallout
One of the effects of nuclear weapons detonated on or near the earth’s
surface is the resulting radioactive fallout. Immediately after
the detonation, a great deal of earth and debris, made radioactive
by the blast, is carried high into the atmosphere, forming a mushroom
cloud. The material drifts downwind and gradually falls back to
earth, contaminating thousands of square miles. This page describes
the fallout pattern over a seven-day period.
Assumptions:
Wind speed: 15 mph
Wind direction: due east
Time frame: 7 days
3,000 Rem
Distance: 30 miles
Much more than a lethal dose of radiation. Death can occur within
hours of exposure. About 10 years will need to pass before levels
of radioactivity in this area drop low enough to be considered safe,
by U.S. peacetime standards.
900 Rem
Distance: 90 miles
A lethal dose of radiation. Death occurs from two to fourteen days.
300 Rem
Distance: 160 miles
Causes extensive internal damage, including harm to nerve cells
and the cells that line the digestive tract, and results in a loss
of white blood cells. Temporary hair loss is another result.
90 Rem
Distance: 250 miles
Causes a temporary decrease in white blood cells, although there
are no immediate harmful effects. Two to three years will need to
pass before radioactivity levels in this area drop low enough to
be considered safe, by U.S. peacetime standards.
NOTE: This information has been drawn mainly from “The
Effects of Nuclear War” (Washington: Office of Technology
Assessment, Congress of the United States, 1979) and the PBS Special
“Race For The Superbomb”. The zones of destruction described
on this page are broad generalizations and do not take into account
factors such as weather and geography of the target.
Nuclear Exposure and Experiments:
Secret, Illegal, Unethical
After the Manhattan Project successfully developed the first atomic
bombs, the US engaged in the large scale production of nuclear weapons
in various, secret 'atomic cities', or massive nuclear complexes
in Oakridge, Tennessee and Hanford, Washington State. The bomb project
was a public unknown, a classified government secret. As scientists
and workers continued to use and manufacture elements such as plutonium
to develop the bomb, there ensued a certain fear that not enough
was known about these new radioactive elements, and the biological
hazards that they might present.
In the 1940's, the US government began a regime of human radiological
testing that remained secret well into the 1990's. Ordinary citizens
were unwittingly injected with plutonium in public hospitals of
San Francisco and New York State. Prisoners in Oregon underwent
testicular radiation experiments. Workers at Hanford were fed radioactive
fish, while at Los Alamos the chosen fare was small spheres of uranium-235
and manganese-54. These and other such procedures were carried out
in a deeply clandestine manner, in order to better discover the
health effects of radiation on biological systems. Surprisingly,
not a lot was learned. The experiments had varying effects and no
overall report was produced from decades of secret human tests.
However, evidence today clearly suggests that exposure to radiation
impacts human health and the well being of all life.
The Presidential Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
established by US President Bill Clinton in 1994 found that between
1944 and 1974 the US conducted or sponsored about 4000 experiments
involving up to 20 000 people. In 1996, the federal government announced
that it would pay $4.8 million in compensation to survivors of secret
cold war experiments in which patients were injected with radioactive
isotopes without their consent.
The experiments were an offshoot of the Manhattan Project and
were developed to gain an understanding of the biological consequences
of nuclear warfare. They violated the Nuremberg code, as in most
cases patients were unaware that they were experimental subjects
and were not only unlikely to derive any therapeutic benefit from
their participation but were also subjected to potential harm.
The experiments were performed under the auspices of the Department
of Defense, the Department of Energy, and the Atomic Energy Commission.
They were conducted by both military officials and civilian physicians
and scientists.
The experiments were intended to study the short and long term effects
of radiation exposure, establish "safe" exposure limits,
and develop accurate radioactivity monitoring assays. The monitoring
assays developed are still standard today. Although much of the
research advanced biomedical science, many studies were performed
in the pursuit of national defense and in the interests of space
exploration.
Populations and individuals around the world have been affected
by the increase of radioactive materials in the global ecosystem.
Cancers, birth defects, genetic damage, lowered immunity to diseases:
these are only some of the potential effects of nuclear testing,
uranium mining, radioactive waste burial and all the phases of nuclear
weapons and nuclear energy production.
The United States government has finally acknowledged the link
between nuclear weapons production facilities and elevated levels
of at least 22 kinds of cancers in workers. Compensation for those
who have been adversely affected is the focus of current negotiations.
These negotiations are the result of an admission from Energy Secretary
Bill Richardson, in January 2000, that the health of nuclear weapons
workers may have suffered due to exposure to radiation. He stated
that:
"This is the first time that the government is acknowledging that
people got cancer from radiation exposure in the plants
.In
the past, the role of government was to take a hike, and I think
that was wrong."
It is not only the worker population that has experienced the maligning
effects of nuclear technology. Accidents at civilian nuclear power
facilities have leaked cancerous and mutagenic isotopes into the
environment for more than 50 years. Nuclear accidents such as Chernobyl
and Three Mile Island have spread radiation across Europe and North
America. Due to the long-lived nature of the radioactive contaminants
from these two occurrences, the effects continue to be felt. In
the contaminated regions around Chernobyl, for example, there has
been a sharp increase in thyroid cancer, severe mental retardation
due to prenatal exposure, and genetic damage in human, animal and
plant life.
The most recent nuclear accident in Japan at the Toki-mura uranium
facility has raised the specter of radiation poisoning for urban
populations. The unfortunate criticality event also highlighted
a lax approach to health and safety practice, which, with recent
indictments against British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) appears to be endemic
in the international nuclear fraternity. BNFL is presently under
review by the UK Nuclear Installations Inspectorate for falsifying
safety checks of MOX fuel it cleared to ship to Japan. The falsification
was revealed after the plutonium fuel arrived in Japan from the
UK, a sea going journey of approximately 20,000 miles. It later
emerged that BNFL had also falsified safety checks for fuel elements
sent to Germany and Switzerland over the last three years.
It is now clear that: health problems can be linked to radiation
exposure; nuclear accidents have prolonged effects on human health
and ecological integrity; and health and safety regulations within
nuclear facilities across the globe are not being applied with the
rigor that is an essential requirement for long-lived radioactive
materials.
Facts and Figures
- Over the past 60 years, the standards set for occupational exposure
has dropped from 30 rems per year in 1934 to 5 rems per year in
1987. These changes in the exposure limits were dramatically altered,
as the health effects of radiation became further understood.
- Single radiation doses of over about 1 gray can cause radiation
sickness. Acute effects include nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea,
sometimes accompanied by malaise, fever, and hemorrhage. The victim
may die in a few hours, days or weeks. Other acute effects can
include sterility and radiation burns, depending on the absorbed
dose and the rate of the exposure.
- For radiation doses less than about 1 sievert, stochastic, or
random, effects are of the greatest concern. Cancer and inheritable
genetic damage may appear many years or decades after exposure.
Estimates of the magnitude of low-dose radiation effects have
tended to rise over the years, but remain the subject of controversy.
That Chernobyl is giving rise to a new range of deformations and
that cancer in the United States is becoming an epidemic, provides
new opportunities to assess the health risks of routine exposure
from leaks in commercial power plants, nuclear weapons production
facilities, uranium mines and test sites.
- The largest source of radioactive waste threatening human health
and genomes is the tailings resulting from uranium mining. These
mines are often in indigenous communities with lower than adequate
public health monitoring and medical facilities.
- Approximately 2,051 nuclear weapons were detonated in the pursuit
of 'security' between 1945 - 1995, an average of one every 9 days
during a 50 year period. The 423 above ground tests are estimated
to have put 11-13 million curies of strontium-90, 17-21 million
curies of cesium-137, 10 million curies of carbon-14 and 225,000
curies of plutonium into the environment.
- The US National Cancer Institute released a report in 1997 revealing
that iodine-131 from nuclear testing was found in every single
county of the United States.
- Temporary sterility in men can occur with a single absorbed
dose, of about 0.15 grays, to the testis. In children, the threshold
for congenital (existing at or dating from birth) malformation
and other developmental abnormalities has been estimated to be
0.25 grays of radiation exposure up to 28 days of gestation.
- The dose at which half the exposed population would die in 60
days without medical treatment is called the LD50 dose (LD for
lethal dose, and 50 for 50 percent). It is about 4 seiverts for
adults.
Resources
Federation
of American Scientists
Institute for Energy
and Environmental Research
International Campaign
to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN)
International Physicians
for the Prevention of Nuclear War
NoNukes.org
Nuclear Information
and Resource Service
Subscribe to the following newsletters/journals to be kept up to
date on nuclear issues concerning the production of nuclear power,
the manufacture of nuclear weapons, and nuclear waste
'clean-up':
IEER/Science
and Democratic Action
WISE-Paris/Plutonium
Investigation
The
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
NucNews
References Cited/Further Reading
Makhijani, Arjun, Howard Hu, Katherine Yih, editors. Nuclear
Wastelands: a Global Guide to Nuclear Weapons Production and Its
Health and Environmental Effects (written in association with
the Special Commission of International Physicians for the Prevention
of Nuclear War and the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research).
Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1995.
Permanent Peoples Tribunal International Medical Commission
on Chernobyl. Chernobyl: Environmental, Health and Human Rights
Implications. Vienna, Austria, 12-15 April 1996.
Shapiro, Jacob (editor). Radiation Protection: A Guide for Scientists
and Physicians. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,
1990.
Wald, Matthew L. US Acknowledges Radiation Killed Weapons
Workers. New York Times. 29 January 2000.
Welsome, Eileen. The Plutonium Files New York: Dial Press,
1999.
777 UN Plaza - 6th Floor - New York, NY - 10017 - Ph: 212.682.1265 - Fax: 212.286.8211 - info@reachingcriticalwill.org
This site was created by Kache Productions ©2008
|