We use Google Analytics to learn more about who is reading the resources on our website. Please read Google Analytics privacy policy for further information. Close

logo_reaching-critical-will

No More New START

On 5 February 2026, the last remaining nuclear arms control agreement between Russia and the United States expired. The urgency of abolishing nuclear weapons is greater than ever.

Image credit: Paul Lichtblau | Unsplash

5 February 2025
By Ray Acheson

On 5 February 2026, the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), the last remaining nuclear arms control agreement between Russia and the United States, officially expired. In September 2025, the Russian government offered to continue implementing the Treaty for another year if the US government agreed, but the Trump regime did not formally respond to that offer. Instead, his administration has insisted on nuclear arms control talks with China, which has a much smaller arsenal than either Russia or the United States and has so far refused to engage in such negotiations.

The expiration of New START means that Russia and the United States could increase their deployed warheads substantially within a matter of months. New START, agreed in 2010, obligated Russia and the United States to reduce their operationally deployed, strategic nuclear warheads to:

  • 700 deployed intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers assigned to nuclear missions;
  • 1,550 nuclear warheads deployed on those platforms; and
  • 800 launchers (both deployed and non-deployed).

The Treaty also included mechanisms for compliance and verification, twice-yearly exchanges of data, ongoing mutual notification about the movement of strategic nuclear forces, short-notice, on-site inspections of missiles, warheads, and launchers covered by the Treaty, and a bilateral consultative commission and clear procedures to resolve questions or disputes.

The cost of New START, however, was high. The Obama administration agreed to a massive nuclear weapon modernisation programme in exchange for ratification by the US Senate. This modernisation programme continues today, with the US government spending billions every year to “upgrade” its nuclear arsenal, delivery systems, and related facilities. Thus, as ICAN Australia notes, US ratification of New START “has arguably done more harm by entrenching the United States’ possession of nuclear weapons and thwarting prospects for disarmament.” Fifteen years later, we still have the modernisation programme, but not the treaty for which it was bargained.

Russia has also been modernising its nuclear arsenal over the past years, and has threatened to use nuclear weapons in the context of its war in Ukraine. In 2024, Russia spent about 8.1 billion USD on its nuclear weapon programme, while the US spent about 56.8 billion USD. The Trump regime has suggested it might restart explosive nuclear testing, and has engaged in several unlawful military actions over the past year, including in Iran and Venezuela. Both Russia and the US are in violation of many international laws and have shown disdain for any attempt to restrain their violence. In this context, prospects for nuclear arms control, let alone disarmament, look grim.

However, it’s important to recognise that the failure of Russia and the United States to extend New START or negotiate a new arms control agreement does not mark the beginning of a new nuclear arms race. The arms race has been underway for many years already. While the expiration of New START marks another development along this path, it is a path both countries were already on. Furthermore, New START itself, while limiting certain deployments, did not lead to denuclearisation. Instead, it led to further expansion of nuclear arsenals. Whatever comes next must be substantially different—it must advance disarmament, not arms control; it must led to abolition, not retrenchment of the weapons and systems that have led us further to destruction.

The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) was developed exactly for this purpose. Supported by the majority of countries in the world, the TPNW offers a clear path to the end of nuclear weapons and the dangerous game being played by states that are gambling with all our lives. As ICAN says, “The dire international security environment at present, rather than serving as an excuse for inaction, must spur urgent action on disarmament…. Joining the TPNW is an important step that all countries can take to press for disarmament in these dangerous times.”

Reaching Critical Will urges:

  • Russia and the United States to stick to the limits of New START and continue or restart the other measures of New START while they engage in good faith negotiations to end the arms race and achieve nuclear disarmament, as they and other nuclear-armed states are obligated to do under the Non-Proliferation Treaty;
  • All nuclear-amed states to join the TPNW and end their nuclear weapon programmes—and in the meantime, to stop their nuclear weapon modernisation programmes, refrain from expanding or sharing their arsenals, and not develop and deploy “missile defence” or nuclear space systems; and
  • All states to reverse course from violating and dismantling international law, to instead pursue security through disarmament and diplomacy.